Nancy R. Gee
- Genetics top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Megan K. MuellerDouglas L. NelsonKerstin MeintsKerri E. RodriguezErika FriedmannGerson Américo JanczuraDaniel S. MillsShelly Harris
- Topics
- Human-Animal Interaction Studies (70 papers)Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (21 papers)Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (12 papers)
- Cited by
- GeneticsSmall AnimalsPharmacy
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEPsychological Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustria
In The Last Decade
Nancy R. Gee
84 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Genetics 2.0k
- Social Psychology 781
- Small Animals 478
- Cognitive Neuroscience 414
- Geography, Planning and Development 329
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy R. Gee
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy R. Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy R. Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy R. Gee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy R. Gee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy R. Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy R. Gee. The network helps show where Nancy R. Gee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy R. Gee
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy R. Gee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy R. Gee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy R. Gee. Nancy R. Gee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 105 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 106 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 67 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | Describing That Which Cannot be Measured, Catalogued, or Classified | 2 |
| 20 | 157 |
About Nancy R. Gee
Nancy R. Gee is a scholar working on Small Animals, Genetics and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (70 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (21 papers) and Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (2.0k citations), Small Animals (478 citations) and Pharmacy (315 citations). Nancy R. Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Megan K. Mueller, Douglas L. Nelson, Kerstin Meints, Kerri E. Rodriguez, Erika Friedmann, Gerson Américo Janczura, Daniel S. Mills, Shelly Harris, James A. Griffin and Harold Herzog. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.