Nancy Seear
Impact in
- Public Administration top 5%
- Labor Movements and Unions
-
- Management and Organizational Studies
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Papers in
-
- Higher Education and Employability 1
- Reflective Practices in Education 1
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 1
- Co-authors
- A. K. Rice (1 shared paper)Allan Flanders (1 shared paper)H. A. Clegg (1 shared paper)John H. Smith (3 shared papers)F. J. Roethlisberger (1 shared paper)Ching‐Chi Chi (1 shared paper)Robert B. McKersie (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Economica (4 papers)British Journal of Sociology (3 papers)American Economic Review (1 paper)Population (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Nancy Seear
11 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Public Administration 89
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 67
- General Psychology 6
- Management Science and Operations Research 44
- Political Science and International Relations 65
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Seear
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Seear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Seear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Seear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Seear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Seear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Seear. The network helps show where Nancy Seear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Seear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1959 | 136 | |
| 2 | 1955 | 112 | |
| 3 | 1963 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1962 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1956 | 13 | |
| 6 | The Economic Position of Women in the United Kingdom | 1976 | 10 |
| 7 | 1959 | 4 | |
| 8 | A career for women in industry | 1964 | 4 |
| 9 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1957 | 3 | |
| 11 | Two studies in industrial relations | 1968 | 1 |
| 12 | 2023 | 0 |
About Nancy Seear
Nancy Seear is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 12 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Platforms and Economics (1 paper), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper), Political and Economic history of UK and US (1 paper), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper), Higher Education and Employability (1 paper), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper), Counseling Practices and Supervision (1 paper) and Reflective Practices in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (89 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (67 citations), General Psychology (6 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (44 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (65 citations). Frequent co-authors include A. K. Rice, Allan Flanders, H. A. Clegg, John H. Smith, F. J. Roethlisberger, Ching‐Chi Chi and Robert B. McKersie. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, British Journal of Sociology, American Economic Review, Population and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.