John H. Smith

68 papers receiving 767 citations

Peers

John H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • General Decision Sciences 30
  • Management Science and Operations Research 161
  • Economics and Econometrics 276
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 27
  • Algebra and Number Theory 31
Replace Sven Berg with:
Sven Berg Sweden
Iain Buchanan United Kingdom
Qingmin Liu China
Stephen D. Smith United States
Yasuhito Tanaka Japan
Roger Chen United States
Riccardo Rebonato United Kingdom
Stephen M. Goldberg United States
Frank Westerhoff Germany
Clarence C. Y. Kwan Canada
John H. Smith relative to Sven Berg Sweden Sven Berg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Sven Berg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John H. Smith. The network helps show where John H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John H. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John H. Smith Line = papers co-authored together John H. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1973291
2 1969153
3 197450
4 197736
5
Failure mechanisms in high performance materials
198532
6 197728
7 197127
8 199920
9 199516
10 196315
11 196215
12
A DESCENT ALGORITHM FOR SOLVING A VARIETY OF MONOTONE EQUILIBRIUM PROBLEMS
198415
13 199510
14 196910
15 19949
16 19959
17 19978
18 19928
19 19777
20 19567

About John H. Smith

John H. Smith is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering, Geometry and Topology and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 85 papers that have together received 904 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (6 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (5 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (4 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (4 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (3 papers), Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (3 papers) and Magnetism in coordination complexes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (30 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (161 citations), Economics and Econometrics (276 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (27 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (31 citations). John H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Bertrand, Donald G. VanDerveer, P. G. Eller, Burton Fein, Nancy Seear, Basil Gordon, Michael J. Smith, Mahendra Rana, Ching‐Chi Chi and Richard Fay. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Inorganic Chemistry, Journal of the American Statistical Association and The American Statistician.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact