Nancy Claiborne

752 citations
36 papers · 571 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Claiborne

34 papers receiving 521 citations

Peers

Nancy Claiborne
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Public Administration 191
  • Safety Research 108
  • General Health Professions 270
  • Rehabilitation 43
  • Clinical Psychology 125
Replace Jill Doner Kagle with:
Jill Doner Kagle United States
Dorothy Horsburgh United Kingdom
Laura Cook United Kingdom
Jermaine Ravalier United Kingdom
Ben Gray New Zealand
Agnes Meershoek Netherlands
Anne McGrath United States
Anne Opie New Zealand
Judith Stoecker United States
Michelle Cornes United Kingdom
Nancy Claiborne relative to Jill Doner Kagle United States Jill Doner Kagle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.3×
Jill Doner Kagle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Claiborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Claiborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Claiborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Claiborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Claiborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Claiborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Claiborne. The network helps show where Nancy Claiborne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Claiborne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Claiborne Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Claiborne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20193
2 20164
3 201518
4 201410
5 20147
6 20149
7 201334
8 201351
9 201140
10 20103
11
Design teams: a promising organizational intervention for improving turnover rates in the child welfare workforce.
200920
12 20090
13 20068
14 20064
15 200649
16 20049
17
Research Team members
20041
18 200111
19 200125
20 199911

About Nancy Claiborne

Nancy Claiborne is a scholar working on Public Administration, Safety Research, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (19 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (9 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (5 papers), Community Health and Development (5 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (4 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (191 citations), Safety Research (108 citations), General Health Professions (270 citations), Rehabilitation (43 citations) and Clinical Psychology (125 citations). Nancy Claiborne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Indonesia and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Charles Auerbach, Catherine Lawrence, Hal A. Lawson, Brenda G. McGowan, Herman H. Vandenburgh, Trudy Millard Krause, Lei Wu, Binahayati Rusyidi, Jessica Strolin-Goltzman and Mary McCarthy. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Research on Social Work Practice, Social Work in Health Care, Health & Social Work and Administration in Social Work.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026