Research on Social Work Practice

2.0k papers and 37.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Research on Social Work Practice in the last decades have received a total of 37.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Research on Social Work Practice usually cover Clinical Psychology (903 papers), General Health Professions (844 papers) and Public Administration (514 papers) specifically the topics of Social Work Education and Practice (510 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (378 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (252 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research on Social Work Practice are Eileen Gambrill, Daniel T. L. Shek, Allen Rubin, Abraham Flexner, James W. Dearing, Brad Lundahl, David P. MacKinnon, Mark W. Fräser, John S. Brekke and Dean L. Fixsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Research on Social Work Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research on Social Work Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research on Social Work Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Research on Social Work Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research on Social Work Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research on Social Work Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research on Social Work Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025