Nancy Armstrong
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism 6
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 5
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 5
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 4
- History top 0.2%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 4
- Museology top 2%
- Cultural Studies top 1%
- Religious studies top 2%
-
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 4
-
- Irish and British Studies 3
- Foucault, Power, and Ethics 2
Nancy Armstrong
43 papers receiving 525 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Literature and Literary Theory 656
- History 295
- Museology 54
- Cultural Studies 121
- Religious studies 59
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Armstrong
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Armstrong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Armstrong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Armstrong. The network helps show where Nancy Armstrong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 11 | Translating Voices, Translating Regions | 2006 | 3 |
| 12 | 1994 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 46 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 19 | The Ideology of conduct : essays on literature and the history of sexuality | 1987 | 72 |
| 20 | 1986 | 1 |
About Nancy Armstrong
Nancy Armstrong is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History, Gender Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Philosophy, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (6 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (5 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (5 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (656 citations), History (295 citations), Museology (54 citations), Cultural Studies (121 citations) and Religious studies (59 citations). Nancy Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Jamaica. Frequent co-authors include James Grantham Turner, Leonard Tennenhouse, Donald E. Hall, Mary Poovey, Kevin Sharpe, Warren Montag, Linda M. Shires, Malcolm Jack, Federico Federici and Simon Eliot. Their work appears in journals such as NOVEL A Forum on Fiction, differences, Eighteenth-Century Studies, American Literary History and Contemporary Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.