Eighteenth-Century Studies

1.9k papers and 25.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Eighteenth-Century Studies in the last decades have received a total of 25.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Eighteenth-Century Studies usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (425 papers), History (378 papers) and Anthropology (347 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Literary Studies (227 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (181 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (170 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Eighteenth-Century Studies are Alan Sheridan, Mary Louise Pratt, Nancy Armstrong, James Grantham Turner, Margaret C. Jacob, Martha Woodmansee, Lynn Hunt, Nicholas Hudson, Jeremy D. Popkin and G. S. Rousseau.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Eighteenth-Century Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Eighteenth-Century Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Eighteenth-Century Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Eighteenth-Century Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Eighteenth-Century Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Eighteenth-Century Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eighteenth-Century Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025