Claudia L. Johnson
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- History top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Religious studies top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Janet ToddJames ThompsonJane AustenSusan J. WolfsonBarbara M. TaylorAlan E. RichardsonAndrew ElfenbeinAnne K. Mellor
- Topics
- Literature Analysis and Criticism (8 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (8 papers)Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Claudia L. Johnson
19 papers receiving 199 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Literature and Literary Theory 251
- History 128
- Sociology and Political Science 105
- Religious studies 55
- Political Science and International Relations 47
Countries citing papers authored by Claudia L. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudia L. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudia L. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudia L. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudia L. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudia L. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudia L. Johnson. The network helps show where Claudia L. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudia L. Johnson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudia L. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudia L. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudia L. Johnson. Claudia L. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Jane Austen's Relics and the Treasures of the East Room | 3 |
| 5 | Sense and sensibility : authoritative text, contexts, criticism | 4 |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Run mad, but do not faint | 0 |
| 10 | Mansfield Park : authoritative text, contexts, criticism | 1 |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Considerations on religion and public education . and, Brief reflections relative to the emigrant French clergy | 1 |
| 16 | 35 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 172 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Claudia L. Johnson
Claudia L. Johnson is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Music, having authored 25 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature Analysis and Criticism (8 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (8 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (251 citations), History (128 citations) and Religious studies (55 citations). Claudia L. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Janet Todd, James Thompson, Jane Austen, Susan J. Wolfson, Barbara M. Taylor, Alan E. Richardson, Andrew Elfenbein, Anne K. Mellor, Mitzi Myers and Tom Furniss. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, College English and Eighteenth-Century Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.