Malcolm Jack

574 citations
22 papers · 171 indexed · h-index 9

Malcolm Jack

16 papers receiving 124 citations

Peers

Malcolm Jack
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Philosophy 43
  • Political Science and International Relations 72
  • History 29
  • Museology 7
  • General Psychology 2
Replace Paul C. Nagel with:
Paul C. Nagel United States
J. A. W. Gunn Canada
Carl R. Lovitt
Francis D. Wormuth United States
Jane H. Pease United States
David Eastwood United Kingdom
W. A. Speck United Kingdom
Marcus Cunliffe United Kingdom
Jeremy Jennings United Kingdom
Janet Semple Australia
Malcolm Jack relative to Paul C. Nagel United States Paul C. Nagel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Paul C. Nagel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm Jack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Jack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Jack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Jack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm Jack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Jack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Jack. The network helps show where Malcolm Jack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Malcolm Jack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Malcolm Jack Line = papers co-authored together Malcolm Jack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20190
2
Lisbon, City of the Sea: A History
20070
3 20071
4 20073
5 200610
6 19945
7
Public-private partnership organizations in health care: cooperative strategies and models.
19936
8 19929
9 199111
10 19915
11 19911
12
Corruption & Progress: The Eighteenth-Century Debate
19899
13
The social and political thought of Bernard Mandeville
19874
14 198712
15 19849
16 19788
17 19760
18 197622
19
Erskine May's treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament
197126
20 19631

About Malcolm Jack

Malcolm Jack is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, History, Urban Studies and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper), History of Science and Natural History (1 paper), Historical Economic and Social Studies (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Public-Private Partnership Projects (1 paper), European Political History Analysis (1 paper) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (43 citations), Political Science and International Relations (72 citations), History (29 citations), Museology (7 citations) and General Psychology (2 citations). Malcolm Jack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Millar, Thomas Erskine May, Richard F. Teichgraeber, Peter Jones, Maurice Cranston, Leonard Tennenhouse, Nancy Armstrong, David Spadafora, K. C. Wheare and R. Gerard Ward. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, Journal of the History of Ideas, Environment and Urbanization, The Philosophical Quarterly and IDS Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026