Jonathan Dollimore
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 8
- Gender Studies top 5%
- History top 0.5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 1
- Music top 2%
-
- Irish and British Studies 3
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 1
- Marriage and Sexual Relationships 1
-
- Historical Art and Culture Studies 2
-
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 2
-
- Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research 1
- Co-authors
- Bruce R. SmithAlan SinfieldPeter EricksonJonathan CreweJohn F. AndrewsGeorge W. FentonAnnette E. MaxwellP. B. C. Fenwick
- Journals
- Textual Practice (6 papers)The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Oxford Literary Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPolandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Dollimore
23 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Literature and Literary Theory 370
- Gender Studies 158
- History 170
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 78
- Music 48
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Dollimore
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Dollimore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Dollimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Dollimore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Dollimore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Dollimore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Dollimore. The network helps show where Jonathan Dollimore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Dollimore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 242 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 186 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 193 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 69 | |
| 19 | The selected plays of John Webster | 1983 | 1 |
| 20 | 1974 | 24 |
About Jonathan Dollimore
Jonathan Dollimore is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Museology, Religious studies, Philosophy and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 949 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Irish and British Studies (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (2 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers), Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Research (1 paper), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (1 paper), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (1 paper) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (370 citations), Gender Studies (158 citations), History (170 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (78 citations) and Music (48 citations). Jonathan Dollimore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Poland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bruce R. Smith, Alan Sinfield, Peter Erickson, Jonathan Crewe, John F. Andrews, George W. Fenton, Annette E. Maxwell, P. B. C. Fenwick, Catherine Belsey and A. T. Rundle. Their work appears in journals such as Textual Practice, The Modern Language Review, Oxford Literary Review, Critical Quarterly and Shakespeare Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.