Nabil Amara

7.2k citations
83 papers · 5.1k indexed · h-index 34

Nabil Amara

81 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

Nabil Amara
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 1.2k
  • Strategy and Management 1.8k
  • Business and International Management 200
  • Public Administration 200
  • Management Science and Operations Research 645
Replace Réjean Landry with:
Réjean Landry Canada
Jason Owen‐Smith United States
Laurel Smith‐Doerr United States
Laura B. Cardinal United States
Markus Perkmann United Kingdom
John Dumay Australia
Maureen McKelvey Sweden
David Strang United States
Cohen United States
Brian Boyd United States
Nabil Amara relative to Réjean Landry Canada Réjean Landry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Réjean Landry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nabil Amara

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nabil Amara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nabil Amara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nabil Amara more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nabil Amara

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nabil Amara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nabil Amara. The network helps show where Nabil Amara may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nabil Amara, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nabil Amara Line = papers co-authored together Nabil Amara links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20231
4 202112
5 20189
6 201725
7 201714
8 20161
9 201510
10 201412
11 2010131
12 201045
13 200810
14 200836
15 200716
16 2006208
17 2006191
18 200542
19
Capital Social, Innovation, Territoires et Politiques Publiques *
20032
20 19993

About Nabil Amara

Nabil Amara is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management, Business and International Management, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 83 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (34 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (18 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (13 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (11 papers), Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis (10 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (9 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (6 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (1.2k citations), Strategy and Management (1.8k citations), Business and International Management (200 citations), Public Administration (200 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (645 citations). Nabil Amara has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Réjean Landry, Моктар Ламари, Mathieu Ouimet, Norrin Halilem, Namatié Traoré, David Doloreux, Nizar Becheikh, Pablo D’Este, Julia Olmos‐Peñuela and Omar Belkhodja. Their work appears in journals such as Research Policy, Journal of Business Research, Scientometrics, Technovation and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026