Scientometrics
About
In The Last Decade
Scientometrics
6.6k papers receiving 182.1k citations
Fields of papers published in Scientometrics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scientometrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scientometrics.
Countries where authors publish in Scientometrics
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scientometrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scientometrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scientometrics more than expected).
- Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)
- The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)
- The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)
- Citation review of Lagergren kinetic rate equation on adsorption reactions (2004)
- Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer (2017)
- Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer (2017)
- Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)
- A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)
- Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)
- The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics (2001)
- Mapping the backbone of science (2005)
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)
- Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature (2016)
- Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience (2009)
- Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation (2003)
- Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis (2015)
- Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance (2002)
- Industry 5.0: improving humanization and sustainability of Industry 4.0 (2022)
- Co-word maps of biotechnology: An example of cognitive scientometrics (1984)
- On the origins of bibliometrics (2006)
- Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)
- Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study (2006)
- Analysing the conceptual evolution of qualitative marketing research through science mapping analysis (2014)
- Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods (2010)
- Self-citations at the meso and individual levels: effects of different calculation methods (2010)
- Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of Materials Science (2006)
- Science in america latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators (1999)
- Recognition and international collaboration: the Brazilian case (2002)
- The influence of scientific research output of academics on economic growth in South Africa: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) application (2012)
- One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional category of scientists (2003)
- Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators (1999)
- International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases (2006)
- Citation networks in information science (1981)
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.