Misha Zilberter
- Physiology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Yuri ZilberterTibor HarkanyHeikki TanilaLívia FülöpBotond PenkeAsla PitkänenMárton B. DobszaySylvain Rheims
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Misha Zilberter
29 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Physiology 889
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 883
- Molecular Biology 516
- Neurology 315
- Cognitive Neuroscience 311
Countries citing papers authored by Misha Zilberter
This map shows the geographic impact of Misha Zilberter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Misha Zilberter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Misha Zilberter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Misha Zilberter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Misha Zilberter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Misha Zilberter. The network helps show where Misha Zilberter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Misha Zilberter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Misha Zilberter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Misha Zilberter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Misha Zilberter. Misha Zilberter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 71 | |
| 3 | 64 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 92 | |
| 14 | 72 | |
| 15 | 160 | |
| 16 | Amyloid β-Induced Neuronal Hyperexcitability Triggers Progressive Epilepsybreakdown → | 520 |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 78 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Misha Zilberter
Misha Zilberter is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (883 citations), Biological Psychiatry (117 citations) and Neurology (315 citations). Misha Zilberter has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Yuri Zilberter, Tibor Harkany, Heikki Tanila, Lívia Fülöp, Botond Penke, Asla Pitkänen, Márton B. Dobszay, Sylvain Rheims, Rimante Minkeviciene and Anton Malkov. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Brain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.