Miles A. Tinker

37 papers receiving 787 citations

Peers

Miles A. Tinker
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Human-Computer Interaction 165
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 365
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 31
  • General Psychology 16
Replace Joseph A. Steger with:
Joseph A. Steger United States
Richard E. Schutz United States
E. A. Lunzer United Kingdom
Jacqueline Sachs United States
Lawrence T. Frase United States
Ricardo Nemirovsky United States
Frank R. Yekovich United States
Francis M. Dwyer United States
Lorraine Jensen Ireland
Ellen D. Gagné United States
Miles A. Tinker relative to Joseph A. Steger United States Joseph A. Steger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Joseph A. Steger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Miles A. Tinker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Miles A. Tinker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Miles A. Tinker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Miles A. Tinker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Miles A. Tinker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Miles A. Tinker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Miles A. Tinker. The network helps show where Miles A. Tinker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Miles A. Tinker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Miles A. Tinker Line = papers co-authored together Miles A. Tinker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Legibility of print
1963243
2 1957172
3 1958143
4 1967102
5 195490
6
Teaching Elementary Reading
197537
7 195533
8 195729
9 200726
10 195325
11 195522
12 195518
13 196317
14 195116
15 195214
16 196010
17 19599
18 19579
19 19549
20 19548

About Miles A. Tinker

Miles A. Tinker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Information Systems and Information Systems, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Color Science and Applications (2 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Statistics Education and Methodologies (2 papers), Optics and Image Analysis (2 papers), Text Readability and Simplification (2 papers), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper) and Digital Media and Visual Art (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (165 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (365 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (31 citations) and General Psychology (16 citations). Miles A. Tinker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Guy L. Bond, Jeanne S. Chall, Walter F. Dearborn, M. D. Vernon, Donald G. Paterson, D. Fagan, Dale N. Anderson, S. A. Lewis, JOHN EVANS and Cyril Burt. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology, Optometry and Vision Science, The Journal of Educational Research and Psychological Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact