Mick Cooper

6.2k citations
196 papers · 3.5k indexed · h-index 31

Mick Cooper

182 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Mick Cooper
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
  • Clinical Psychology 2.5k
  • Applied Psychology 354
  • Social Psychology 1.4k
  • General Psychology 38
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 380
Replace Daniël J. Siegel with:
Daniël J. Siegel United States
Thomas G. Plante United States
Andrew Day Australia
Nancy Pistrang United Kingdom
Pamela Ramser
Susan Roth United States
Steve de Shazer United States
C. Edward Watkins United States
Howard Steele United States
Robert L. Leahy United States
Mick Cooper relative to Daniël J. Siegel United States Daniël J. Siegel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Daniël J. Siegel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mick Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mick Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mick Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mick Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mick Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mick Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mick Cooper. The network helps show where Mick Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mick Cooper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mick Cooper Line = papers co-authored together Mick Cooper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20241
4 20240
5 20241
6 20231
7 20234
8 20235
9 20234
10 20233
11 20230
12 20235
13 20233
14 20227
15 202219
16 202131
17 201887
18 201812
19 2006125
20 19921

About Mick Cooper

Mick Cooper is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Conservation and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 196 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (82 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (48 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (44 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (41 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (20 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (15 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (14 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.5k citations), Applied Psychology (354 citations), Social Psychology (1.4k citations), General Psychology (38 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (380 citations). Mick Cooper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and United States. Frequent co-authors include John McLeod, Christina Michael, Michael Barkham, Elspeth Twigg, Joël Vos, Dave Mearns, John C. Norcross, Joshua K. Swift, Jennifer L. Callahan and Susannah R. Parkin. Their work appears in journals such as Psychotherapy Research, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice and Counselling and Psychotherapy Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026