Mick Cooper

6.2k total citations
196 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Mick Cooper is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mick Cooper has authored 196 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 149 papers in Clinical Psychology, 86 papers in Social Psychology and 27 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mick Cooper's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (82 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (48 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (44 papers). Mick Cooper is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (82 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (48 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (44 papers). Mick Cooper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Slovenia and United States. Mick Cooper's co-authors include John McLeod, Christina Michael, Michael Barkham, Elspeth Twigg, Joël Vos, John C. Norcross, Dave Mearns, Joshua K. Swift, Susannah R. Parkin and Jennifer L. Callahan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

In The Last Decade

Mick Cooper

182 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mick Cooper United Kingdom 31 2.5k 1.4k 403 380 354 196 3.5k
Daniël J. Siegel United States 23 2.4k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 328 0.8× 360 0.9× 130 0.4× 56 4.0k
Thomas Curran United Kingdom 29 1.6k 0.6× 1.5k 1.1× 461 1.1× 622 1.6× 371 1.0× 66 3.5k
Mark A. Stokes Australia 35 1.9k 0.7× 928 0.7× 327 0.8× 220 0.6× 197 0.6× 120 4.0k
C. Edward Watkins United States 33 2.6k 1.0× 2.9k 2.1× 385 1.0× 497 1.3× 572 1.6× 252 4.4k
Sebastiano Costa Italy 31 1.9k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 233 0.6× 207 0.5× 428 1.2× 102 3.2k
Thomas G. Plante United States 31 2.3k 0.9× 1.3k 1.0× 573 1.4× 165 0.4× 525 1.5× 192 4.5k
Renata Tambelli Italy 28 2.3k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 304 0.8× 176 0.5× 214 0.6× 109 3.9k
Sherman A. Lee United States 28 2.5k 1.0× 895 0.7× 541 1.3× 175 0.5× 342 1.0× 92 3.5k
Jolene van der Kaap‐Deeder Belgium 19 1.2k 0.5× 1.8k 1.3× 203 0.5× 278 0.7× 577 1.6× 51 2.8k
Mary E. Pritchard United States 25 1.2k 0.5× 623 0.5× 245 0.6× 202 0.5× 276 0.8× 73 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Mick Cooper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mick Cooper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mick Cooper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mick Cooper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mick Cooper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mick Cooper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mick Cooper. The network helps show where Mick Cooper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mick Cooper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mick Cooper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mick Cooper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mick Cooper. Mick Cooper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hayes, Jacqueline, et al.. (2025). Young people's experiences of setting and monitoring goals in school‐based counselling: A thematic analysis. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 98(3). 663–682.
2.
Jacob, Jenna, Lori Wozney, Hanne Weie Oddli, et al.. (2024). Goal‐oriented practices in youth mental health and wellbeing settings: A scoping review and thematic analysis of empirical evidence. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 98(2). 431–477. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gilbert, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Depth of emotional experiencing and outcome in therapy with young people. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 98(2). 308–321.
4.
Cooper, Mick. (2024). Welcoming the Other: Actualising the humanistic ethic at the core of counselling psychology practice. Counselling Psychology Review. 39(1). 37–48.
5.
Gabriel, Lynne, et al.. (2024). Mental health practitioners’ perceptions of online working: a literature review. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 53(2). 190–205.
6.
Barkham, Michael, Mick Cooper, Lynne Gabriel, et al.. (2024). The role of BACP in maximising the potential of counselling and psychological therapies research in the UK: Benefitting clients, communities, and societies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 24(4). 1133–1140. 1 indexed citations
7.
Cooper, Mick, et al.. (2023). Patient perspectives on working with preferences in psychotherapy: A consensual qualitative research study. Psychotherapy Research. 33(8). 1117–1131. 5 indexed citations
10.
Cooper, Mick, et al.. (2023). An exploration of the psychometric properties of the Barrett-Lennard Relationship Inventory (BLRI Obs-40) with young people. Person-Centered & Experiential Psychotherapies. 23(1). 54–69. 1 indexed citations
11.
Cooper, Mick, et al.. (2023). Helpful and unhelpful factors in school-based counselling and pastoral care as usual: analysis of qualitative data from the experience of service questionnaire. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 28(4). 234–248. 1 indexed citations
12.
Sales, Célia M. D., Mark Ashworth, Salma Ayis, et al.. (2022). Idiographic patient reported outcome measures (I‐PROMs) for routine outcome monitoring in psychological therapies: Position paper. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 79(3). 596–621. 19 indexed citations
13.
Cooper, Mick, Megan Stafford, D. H. Saxon, et al.. (2021). Humanistic counselling plus pastoral care as usual versus pastoral care as usual for the treatment of psychological distress in adolescents in UK state schools (ETHOS): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 5(3). 178–189. 27 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Kate, et al.. (2021). Video counselling and psychotherapy: A critical commentary on the evidence base. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 22(1). 92–97. 31 indexed citations
15.
Cooper, Mick, et al.. (2020). WG-A: A Framework for Exploring Analogical Generalization and Argumentation.. Cognitive Science.
16.
Lloyd, Christopher E. M., et al.. (2019). Goal measures for psychotherapy: A systematic review of self‐report, idiographic instruments.. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice. 26(3). 50 indexed citations
17.
Mearns, Dave & Mick Cooper. (2018). Working at Relational Depth in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 87 indexed citations
18.
Cooper, Mick. (2013). Counselling in UK secondary schools. Journal of Animal Science. 93(6). 2693–705. 1 indexed citations
19.
Cooper, Mick. (2001). Automated evaluation of accessibility guidelines.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 67(6). 150–154. 1 indexed citations
20.
Cooper, Mick. (1992). Who named the radian ?. The Mathematical Gazette. 76(475). 100–101. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026