Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The capacity for understanding mental states: The reflective self in parent and child and its significance for security of attachment
1991969 citationsPeter Fonagy, Miriam Steele et al.profile →
Maternal Representations of Attachment during Pregnancy Predict the Organization of Infant-Mother Attachment at One Year of Age
1991708 citationsPeter Fonagy, Howard Steele et al.profile →
The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy.
1996699 citationsPeter Fonagy, Miriam Steele et al.profile →
The relation of attachment status, psychiatric classification, and response to psychotherapy.
1996598 citationsPeter Fonagy, Miriam Steele et al.profile →
This map shows the geographic impact of Howard Steele's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Howard Steele with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Howard Steele more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Howard Steele. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Howard Steele. The network helps show where Howard Steele may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Howard Steele
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Howard Steele.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Howard Steele based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Howard Steele. Howard Steele is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Psouni, Elia, Sonja Breinholst, Barbara Hoff Esbjørn, & Howard Steele. (2018). Factor Structure of the Friends and Family Interview (FFI). Lund University Publications (Lund University).1 indexed citations
Murphy, Anne, Howard Steele, Jordan Bate, et al.. (2015). Group Attachment-Based Intervention. Family & Community Health. 38(3). 268–279.32 indexed citations
9.
Steele, Howard, et al.. (2011). Attachment and Grit: Exploring Possible Contributions of Attachment Styles (from Past and Present Life) to the Adult Personality Construct of Grit. 4(2). 16.14 indexed citations
Fonagy, Peter, et al.. (1997). Children securely attached in infancy perform better in belief-desire reasoning task at age five. UCL Discovery (University College London).8 indexed citations
15.
Steele, Howard. (1997). The Web That Binds Us All: The Future Legal Environment of the Internet. Houston journal of international law. 19(2). 495.2 indexed citations
16.
Fonagy, Peter, et al.. (1996). Ghosts in the nursery: An empirical study of the repercussions of parents' mental representations on the security of attachment. UCL Discovery (University College London).
17.
Fonagy, Peter, et al.. (1994). The theory and practice of resilience. UCL Discovery (University College London).186 indexed citations
Furnham, Adrian, Howard Steele, & David Pendleton. (1993). A response to Dr Belbin's reply. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 66(3). 261–261.20 indexed citations
20.
Steele, Howard, et al.. (1962). THE TRANSITION TO THE ARC MODE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON THERMIONIC CONVERTER PERFORMANCE.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.