Joël Vos

1.7k total citations
48 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Joël Vos is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Genetics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joël Vos has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Clinical Psychology, 13 papers in Genetics and 11 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joël Vos's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (14 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (13 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers). Joël Vos is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (14 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (13 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (8 papers). Joël Vos collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Joël Vos's co-authors include Aad Tibben, Christi J. van Asperen, Fred H. Menko, Mick Cooper, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Nadia van der Spek, William Breitbart, Irma M. Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Pim Cuijpers and Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Joël Vos

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joël Vos Netherlands 19 362 335 224 220 203 48 1.1k
Pagona Roussi Greece 16 132 0.4× 121 0.4× 90 0.4× 154 0.7× 132 0.7× 29 685
Catherine Romero United States 16 101 0.3× 500 1.5× 590 2.6× 377 1.7× 107 0.5× 23 1.2k
Patricia McCarthy Veach United States 20 483 1.3× 394 1.2× 368 1.6× 199 0.9× 310 1.5× 46 1.2k
Michelle Bishop United Kingdom 13 76 0.2× 243 0.7× 219 1.0× 375 1.7× 454 2.2× 34 1.3k
Fiona Ulph United Kingdom 19 272 0.8× 343 1.0× 68 0.3× 181 0.8× 302 1.5× 68 1.1k
Sue Gessler United Kingdom 20 651 1.8× 116 0.3× 63 0.3× 128 0.6× 221 1.1× 34 1.3k
Kathryn M. Kash United States 21 753 2.1× 411 1.2× 199 0.9× 730 3.3× 430 2.1× 35 2.2k
Catherine A. Perz United States 10 149 0.4× 252 0.8× 75 0.3× 89 0.4× 38 0.2× 11 702
Anne L. Ersig United States 13 180 0.5× 106 0.3× 65 0.3× 122 0.6× 201 1.0× 44 669
Kaaren Watts Australia 19 214 0.6× 202 0.6× 41 0.2× 111 0.5× 103 0.5× 31 797

Countries citing papers authored by Joël Vos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joël Vos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joël Vos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joël Vos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joël Vos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joël Vos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joël Vos. The network helps show where Joël Vos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joël Vos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joël Vos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joël Vos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joël Vos. Joël Vos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Vos, Joël. (2023). The Development and Validation of the Meaning Approach Scale: Traditional, Functionalistic and Critical-Intuitive Approaches to Meaning in Life. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. 37(4). 491–513. 1 indexed citations
3.
Vos, Joël. (2023). Existential psychological therapies: An overview of empirical research. Pratiques Psychologiques. 29(4). 211–229. 3 indexed citations
4.
Vos, Joël, et al.. (2021). The Transactional Analysis Review Survey: An Investigation Into Self-Reported Practices and Philosophies of Psychotherapists. Transactional Analysis Journal. 51(2). 111–126. 4 indexed citations
5.
Cooper, Mick, et al.. (2020). An Application of the Three-Step Test-Interview (TSTI) in the Validation of the Relational Depth Frequency Scale. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 65(3). 574–592. 5 indexed citations
6.
Vos, Joël, et al.. (2018). The effects of psychological meaning-centered therapies on quality of life and psychological stress: A metaanalysis. Palliative & Supportive Care. 16(5). 608–632. 93 indexed citations
7.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2017). Efficacy of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine. 47(11). 1990–2001. 93 indexed citations
8.
Vos, Joël, Mick Cooper, Clara E. Hill, et al.. (2017). Five Perspectives on the Meaning of Meaning in the Context of Clinical Practices. Journal of Constructivist Psychology. 32(1). 48–62. 8 indexed citations
9.
Vos, Joël, et al.. (2015). Existential Therapies: A Review Of Their Scientific Foundations and Efficacy. 26(1). 49–69. 12 indexed citations
10.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2014). Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of meaning-centered group psychotherapy in cancer survivors: protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 14(1). 22–22. 47 indexed citations
11.
Vos, Joël, et al.. (2014). Systematic Review of Existential Anxiety Instruments. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 55(2). 173–201. 34 indexed citations
12.
Vos, Joël, et al.. (2014). Existential therapies: A meta-analysis of their effects on psychological outcomes.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 83(1). 115–128. 121 indexed citations
13.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2013). Meaning Making in Cancer Survivors: A Focus Group Study. Psycho-Oncology. 22(9). 319–319. 12 indexed citations
14.
Spek, Nadia van der, Joël Vos, Cornelia F. van Uden–Kraan, et al.. (2013). Meaning Making in Cancer Survivors: A Focus Group Study. PLoS ONE. 8(9). e76089–e76089. 51 indexed citations
15.
Vos, Joël, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Jan C. Oosterwijk, et al.. (2011). A counselee-oriented perspective on risk communication in genetic counseling: Explaining the inaccuracy of the counselees' risk perception shortly after BRCA1/2 test result disclosure. Genetics in Medicine. 13(9). 800–811. 22 indexed citations
16.
Vos, Joël, Anna M. Jansen, Fred H. Menko, et al.. (2011). Family communication matters: The impact of telling relatives about unclassified variants and uninformative DNA-test results. Genetics in Medicine. 13(4). 333–341. 31 indexed citations
18.
Vos, Joël, Caroline Seynaeve, Kathleen Vanheusden, et al.. (2010). The impact of social and personal resources on psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 21(2). 153–160. 19 indexed citations
19.
Vos, Joël, Christi J. van Asperen, Juul Wijnen, Anne M. Stiggelbout, & Aad Tibben. (2009). Disentangling the Babylonian speech confusion in genetic counseling: An analysis of the reliability and validity of the nomenclature for BRCA1/2 DNA-test results other than pathogenic. Genetics in Medicine. 11(10). 742–749. 6 indexed citations
20.
Vos, Joël & Jan Passchier. (2003). Reduced Impact of Migraine in Everyday Life: An Observational Study in the Dutch Society of Headache Patients. Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 43(6). 645–650. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026