Leah Boulos

29 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

Leah Boulos
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • General Health Professions 126
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 38
  • Modeling and Simulation 23
  • Health Informatics 5
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 58
Replace Erin G. Stone with:
Erin G. Stone United States
Mohit Sharma United States
Joshua D. Niforatos United States
Natalia Krzyżaniak Australia
Beth Shaw United Kingdom
Pricila H. Mullachery United States
David Fraile Navarro Australia
Abhiram Kanneganti Singapore
Pierre Lévy France
Joshua Sharfstein United States
Leah Boulos relative to Erin G. Stone United States Erin G. Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.8×
Erin G. Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leah Boulos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leah Boulos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leah Boulos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leah Boulos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leah Boulos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leah Boulos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leah Boulos. The network helps show where Leah Boulos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Leah Boulos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leah Boulos Line = papers co-authored together Leah Boulos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201987
2 202084
3 201875
4 202162
5 202261
6 201948
7 202039
8 202331
9 202125
10 202122
11 202222
12 202422
13 201817
14 202116
15 202010
16 20229
17 20229
18 20218
19 20227
20 20206

About Leah Boulos

Leah Boulos is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Occupational Therapy and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper), Infection Control and Ventilation (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (126 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (38 citations), Modeling and Simulation (23 citations), Health Informatics (5 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (58 citations). Leah Boulos has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel A. Nagel, Kim Mears, Shelley Anne Doucet, Patricia Charlton, William J. Montelpare, Rima Azar, Alison Luke, Jill Alison Hayden, Nicole A. Doria and Adrian R. Levy. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Public Health, Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact