John Mcleod

67 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

John Mcleod
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Numerical Analysis 215
  • Mathematical Physics 315
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 340
  • Applied Mathematics 273
  • Modeling and Simulation 103
Replace Bernard Friedman with:
Bernard Friedman United States
W. K. Schief Australia
E. T. Copson United Kingdom
Ray A. Kunze United States
Harold T. Davis United States
S. Tanveer United States
Charles Radin United States
Anton Arnold Austria
G. L. Lamb United States
V. А. Marchenko Russia
John Mcleod relative to Bernard Friedman United States Bernard Friedman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Bernard Friedman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Mcleod

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Mcleod's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Mcleod with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Mcleod more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Mcleod

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Mcleod. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Mcleod. The network helps show where John Mcleod may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Mcleod, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Mcleod Line = papers co-authored together John Mcleod links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 74 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980240
2 1987148
3 1962127
4 198191
5 198384
6 199467
7 196850
8 198747
9 197846
10 199633
11 195932
12 196931
13 201026
14 199725
15 197425
16 198625
17 199223
18 197023
19 196222
20 198521

About John Mcleod

John Mcleod is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Mechanics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 74 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Design and Applications (12 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (9 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (9 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (8 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (7 papers), Nonlinear Photonic Systems (5 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (5 papers) and Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Numerical Analysis (215 citations), Mathematical Physics (315 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (340 citations), Applied Mathematics (273 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (103 citations). John Mcleod has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include S. P. Hastings, Κ. R. Rajagopal, Peter J. Olver, Paul C. Fife, James Serrin, Yisong Yang, Xinfu Chen, Gero Friesecke, E. C. Titchmarsh and John A. Nohel. Their work appears in journals such as The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis and Laser and Particle Beams.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact