Michelle Schwartz

1.3k total citations
10 papers, 893 citations indexed

About

Michelle Schwartz is a scholar working on Safety Research, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Michelle Schwartz has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 893 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Safety Research, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Michelle Schwartz's work include Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers). Michelle Schwartz is often cited by papers focused on Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers), Disability Education and Employment (3 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (2 papers). Michelle Schwartz collaborates with scholars based in United States. Michelle Schwartz's co-authors include Michael L. Wehmeyer, Rosemary B. Hughes, Susan Robinson‐Whelen, Christine L. Latham, Joy Gabrielli, Emily M. Lund, Katherine McDonald, Katie Arnold, Sally Wilson and Kathleen M. Smits and has published in prestigious journals such as Exceptional Children, Rehabilitation Psychology and Journal of Professional Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Michelle Schwartz

8 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michelle Schwartz United States 8 665 285 227 161 146 10 893
Jane H. Soukup United States 12 727 1.1× 249 0.9× 272 1.2× 199 1.2× 143 1.0× 14 893
Elizabeth Evans Getzel United States 16 780 1.2× 296 1.0× 446 2.0× 132 0.8× 103 0.7× 33 1.0k
Debra Shaver United States 12 618 0.9× 329 1.2× 391 1.7× 130 0.8× 112 0.8× 20 1.1k
Camille Marder United States 11 474 0.7× 328 1.2× 283 1.2× 90 0.6× 78 0.5× 17 831
Mayumi Hagiwara United States 13 417 0.6× 188 0.7× 217 1.0× 142 0.9× 57 0.4× 44 641
Anne-Marie Knokey United States 6 513 0.8× 269 0.9× 294 1.3× 65 0.4× 90 0.6× 8 738
Christine Mason United Kingdom 14 460 0.7× 182 0.6× 314 1.4× 127 0.8× 116 0.8× 37 762
Renée Cameto United States 15 905 1.4× 581 2.0× 634 2.8× 121 0.8× 148 1.0× 30 1.4k
Deanna J. Sands United States 13 423 0.6× 201 0.7× 173 0.8× 134 0.8× 69 0.5× 15 622
Leslie A. Shaw United States 14 405 0.6× 173 0.6× 112 0.5× 107 0.7× 57 0.4× 35 571

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Schwartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Schwartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Schwartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Schwartz. The network helps show where Michelle Schwartz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Schwartz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Schwartz. Michelle Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
2.
Latham, Christine L., et al.. (2020). Using holistic admissions in pre-licensure programs to diversify the nursing workforce. Journal of Professional Nursing. 37(2). 359–365. 17 indexed citations
3.
Hughes, Rosemary B., et al.. (2020). Evaluation of a Safety Awareness Group Program for Adults With Intellectual Disability. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 125(4). 304–317. 8 indexed citations
4.
Hughes, Rosemary B., et al.. (2018). “I really want people to use our work to be safe”…Using participatory research to develop a safety intervention for adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 24(3). 309–325. 17 indexed citations
5.
Schwartz, Michelle, et al.. (2018). Entrepreneurship and Strategy.
6.
Hughes, Rosemary B., et al.. (2010). Development of a safety awareness group intervention for women with diverse disabilities: A pilot study.. Rehabilitation Psychology. 55(3). 263–271. 23 indexed citations
7.
Wehmeyer, Michael L. & Michelle Schwartz. (2001). Disproportionate Representation of Males in Special Education Services: Biology, Behavior, or Bias?.. Education and Treatment of Children. 24(1). 28–45. 50 indexed citations
8.
Wehmeyer, Michael L. & Michelle Schwartz. (1998). The Relationship Between Self-Determination and Quality of Life for Adults with Mental Retardation. Education and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities. 33(1). 3–12. 275 indexed citations
9.
Wehmeyer, Michael L. & Michelle Schwartz. (1998). The Self Determination Focus of Transition Goals for Students with Mental Retardation. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. 21(1). 75–86. 59 indexed citations
10.
Wehmeyer, Michael L. & Michelle Schwartz. (1997). Self-Determination and Positive Adult Outcomes: A Follow-up Study of Youth with Mental Retardation or Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Children. 63(2). 245–255. 444 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026