Michel Denis

18 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Michel Denis
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 89
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 74
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Social Psychology 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 33
Replace M. A. Clements with:
M. A. Clements Australia
Francesca Ferrara Italy
Athanasios Gagatsis Cyprus
Ιλιάδα Ηλία Cyprus
Nancy Cooke United States
Suguru Ishizaki United States
Patricia S. Moyer United States
Rina Hershkowitz Israel
Mary Montgomery Lindquist United States
Jay Elkerton United States
Michel Denis relative to M. A. Clements Australia M. A. Clements's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
M. A. Clements · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michel Denis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Denis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Denis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Denis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Denis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Denis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Denis. The network helps show where Michel Denis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michel Denis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michel Denis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michel Denis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michel Denis. Michel Denis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2
Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Spatial information theory
12
3 3
4 27
5 2
6
La Bretagne des Blancs et des Bleus, 1815-1880
0
7 0
8
Langage et cognition spatiale
14
9 34
10
Image et cognition
66
11 9
12 7
13 0
14 18
15
[Memorization of drawings or nouns according to the material used in recognition].
3
16 7
17 0
18
[Estimation of the cinematographic duration with regard to the structure of the message].
0
19 0
20
1789, les Français ont la parole... : cahiers de doléances des Etats généraux
0

About Michel Denis

Michel Denis is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, History and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Distributed systems and fault tolerance (4 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (74 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations) and Virology (25 citations). Michel Denis has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Esfandiar Ghadirian, Johannes Engelkamp, Hubert D. Zimmer, Danièle Dubois, Gérard Ligozat, Amedeo Cesta, Simone Fratini, Angelo Oddi, Nicola Policella and Gabriella Cortellessa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Applied Psychology and IEEE Intelligent Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026