Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Planty
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Planty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Planty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Planty more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Planty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Planty. The network helps show where Michael Planty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Planty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Planty.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Planty based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Planty. Michael Planty is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Banks, Duren & Michael Planty. (2015). Assessment of Coverage in the Arrest-Related Deaths Program. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).4 indexed citations
3.
Regoeczi, Wendy C., et al.. (2014). Nation's Two Measures of Homicide. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University). 13(5). 1–272.23 indexed citations
4.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009: Indicator 8--Language Minority School-Age Children. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.2 indexed citations
5.
Planty, Michael, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009 in Brief. NCES 2009-082.. National Center for Education Statistics.4 indexed citations
6.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009: Indicator 1--Enrollment Trends by Age. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.2 indexed citations
7.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009: Indicator 10--Undergraduate Enrollment. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.1 indexed citations
8.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009: Indicator 7--Racial/Ethnic Enrollment in Public Schools. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.4 indexed citations
9.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009: Indicator 11--Graduate and First-Professional Enrollment. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.3 indexed citations
10.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2009). The Condition of Education 2009: Indicator 6--Homeschooled Students. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.8 indexed citations
11.
Provasnik, Stephen & Michael Planty. (2008). Community Colleges: Special Supplement to The Condition of Education 2008. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2008-033.. National Center for Education Statistics.100 indexed citations
12.
Planty, Michael, William J. Hussar, Thomas D. Snyder, et al.. (2007). The Condition of Education 2009. NCES 2009-081.. National Center for Education Statistics.159 indexed citations
13.
Planty, Michael, et al.. (2007). High School Coursetaking: Findings from The Condition of Education, 2007. NCES 2007-065.. National Center for Education Statistics.23 indexed citations
14.
Lynch, James P., Callie Marie Rennison, David McDowall, et al.. (2006). Understanding Crime Statistics. Cambridge University Press eBooks.91 indexed citations
15.
Rooney, Patrick, William J. Hussar, Michael Planty, et al.. (2006). The Condition of Education, 2006. NCES 2006-071.. National Center for Education Statistics.58 indexed citations
16.
Planty, Michael, Robert Bozick, & Steven J. Ingels. (2006). Academic Pathways, Preparation, and Performance: A Descriptive Overview of the Transcripts from the High School Graduating Class of 2003-04. E.D. TAB. NCES 2007-316.. National Center for Education Statistics.16 indexed citations
17.
Cahalan, Margaret, et al.. (2006). United States High School Sophomores: A Twenty-Two Year Comparison, 1980-2002. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-327.. National Center for Education Statistics.13 indexed citations
18.
Planty, Michael, et al.. (2005). An Examination of the Conditions of School Facilities Attended by 10th-Grade Students in 2002. E.D. TAB. NCES 2006-302.. National Center for Education Statistics.14 indexed citations
19.
Carlson, Deven, et al.. (2005). What Is the Status of High School Athletes 8 Years after Their Senior Year? Statistics in Brief. NCES 2005-303.. National Center for Education Statistics.14 indexed citations
20.
Ingels, Steven J., et al.. (2005). A Profile of the American High School Senior in 2004: A First Look. Initial Results from the First Follow-Up of the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002). NCES 2006-348.. National Center for Education Statistics.16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.