Michael Lodi

499 citations
15 papers · 148 indexed · h-index 5

Michael Lodi

11 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers

Michael Lodi
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Computer Science Applications 102
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 55
  • Media Technology 15
  • Information Systems 24
  • Software 4
Replace Deborah Butcher with:
Deborah Butcher United States
Moffat Mathews New Zealand
Gerald Futschek Austria
Xinying Hou United States
Ángel Serrano-Laguna Spain
Andrew Emerson United States
Stephen E. Fancsali United States
Serafeim A. Triantafyllou Greece
Augusto Chioccariello Italy
Anett Hoppe Germany
Michael Lodi relative to Deborah Butcher United States Deborah Butcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37×
Deborah Butcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Lodi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Lodi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Lodi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Lodi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Lodi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Lodi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Lodi. The network helps show where Michael Lodi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michael Lodi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Lodi Line = papers co-authored together Michael Lodi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20240
4 20246
5 20240
6 20232
7 20236
8 20221
9 202198
10 20210
11 20211
12 202010
13 20194
14
Computational Thinking in Italian Schools: Quantitative Data and Teachers' Sentiment Analysis after Two Years of.
20171
15 199818

About Michael Lodi

Michael Lodi is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Media Technology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Hardware and Architecture and Statistics and Probability, having authored 15 papers that have together received 148 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Teaching and Learning Programming (8 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (4 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers), Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research (3 papers), Educational Research and Pedagogy (1 paper), Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning (1 paper) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (102 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (55 citations), Media Technology (15 citations), Information Systems (24 citations) and Software (4 citations). Michael Lodi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Simone Martini, Diana De Ronchi, V. Volterra, Giovanni Ravaglia, Paola Rucci, Paola Forti, Violetta Lonati, Mattia Monga, Olivia Levrini and Dario Malchiodi. Their work appears in journals such as Science & Education, Informatics in Education, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Computer Science Education and SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026