Michael Kend

932 citations
34 papers · 655 indexed · h-index 14

Michael Kend

32 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Michael Kend
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Accounting 411
  • Management Information Systems 162
  • Strategy and Management 246
  • Marketing 68
  • Information Systems and Management 51
Replace Philip Wallage with:
Philip Wallage Netherlands
Prem Yapa Australia
N. Rowbottom United Kingdom
Ignace De Beelde Belgium
Reiner Quick Germany
Rainer Lenz Germany
Amr Kotb United Kingdom
Joseph Mensah Onumah Ghana
Mohamed A. K. Basuony Egypt
Prem Lal Joshi Malaysia
Michael Kend relative to Philip Wallage Netherlands Philip Wallage's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Philip Wallage · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Kend

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Kend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Kend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Kend more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Kend

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Kend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Kend. The network helps show where Michael Kend may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Michael Kend, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Kend Line = papers co-authored together Michael Kend links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20240
4 20238
5 20232
6 20224
7 202145
8 202094
9 201715
10 201716
11 20178
12 201637
13 2015106
14 201323
15 20132
16 201017
17
The future of audit: keeping capital markets efficient: towards a national strategy on the future of auditing
20106
18 200816
19 20061
20
Mandatory audit partner rotation: Costs and benefits CLERP 9 proposal
20042

About Michael Kend

Michael Kend is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems, Public Administration, Strategy and Management and Gender Studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 655 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (22 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (8 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (3 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (3 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (411 citations), Management Information Systems (162 citations), Strategy and Management (246 citations), Marketing (68 citations) and Information Systems and Management (51 citations). Michael Kend has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Saudi Arabia and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Lan Anh Nguyen, Christine Jubb, Keith A. Houghton, Tehmina Khan, Susan Robertson, Ilias G. Basioudis, Juliana Ng, Brendan O’Connell, Gillian Vesty and Jacqueline Birt. Their work appears in journals such as Managerial Auditing Journal, Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, International Journal of Auditing, Accounting and Finance and Journal of Cleaner Production.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026