International Journal of Auditing

615 papers and 14.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 615 papers published in International Journal of Auditing in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations. Papers published in International Journal of Auditing usually cover Accounting (517 papers), Strategy and Management (134 papers) and Management Information Systems (104 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (483 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (267 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Auditing are Peter Moizer, David Hay, Gerrit Sarens, Jenny Goodwin, Rob Gray, W. Robert Knechel, Michael Power, Marika Arena, Jerry W. Lin and Mark I. Hwang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Auditing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Auditing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Auditing.

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Auditing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Auditing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Auditing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Auditing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025