Managerial Auditing Journal

1.6k papers and 36.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal in the last decades have received a total of 36.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal usually cover Accounting (979 papers), Management Information Systems (402 papers) and Strategy and Management (390 papers) specifically the topics of Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (852 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (480 papers) and Accounting and Organizational Management (303 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Managerial Auditing Journal are Gerald Vinten, Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Abdifatah Ahmed Haji, Jiju Antony, Ataur Rahman Belal, Zabihollah Rezaee, Khaled Hussainey, Nava Subramaniam, Mostafa Kamal Hassan and Charalambos Spathis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Managerial Auditing Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Managerial Auditing Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Managerial Auditing Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Managerial Auditing Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025