Michael Friend

1.9k citations
116 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Friend

112 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Michael Friend
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Forestry 114
  • Animal Science and Zoology 425
  • Equine 73
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 358
  • Small Animals 48
Replace Barry W Norton with:
Barry W Norton Australia
J. de B. Lourenço Júnior Brazil
J.W. West United States
Matthew H. Poore United States
Gwyneth A. Verkerk New Zealand
K. R. Pond United States
D.K. Combs United States
Don C. Adams United States
A. Cannas Italy
BD Siebert Australia
Michael Friend relative to Barry W Norton Australia Barry W Norton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Barry W Norton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Friend

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Friend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Friend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Friend more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Friend

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Friend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Friend. The network helps show where Michael Friend may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Friend, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Friend Line = papers co-authored together Michael Friend links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016210
2 2012140
3 200769
4 201763
5 201162
6 201661
7 202154
8 201737
9 201737
10 200635
11 201730
12 201728
13 202125
14 201424
15 201321
16 202021
17 201020
18 201120
19 201720
20 201819

About Michael Friend

Michael Friend is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry, Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals and Equine, having authored 116 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (22 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (16 papers), Pasture and Agricultural Systems (14 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (13 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Forestry (114 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (425 citations), Equine (73 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (358 citations) and Small Animals (48 citations). Michael Friend has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin W.B. Holman, David Laurence Hopkins, Cassius E.O. Coombs, Susan Robertson, Edward H. Clayton, Shawn R. McGrath, David L. Swain, John Broster, J. F. Wilkins and Paul Damien McGreevy. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Production Science, Meat Science, animal, Animal Reproduction Science and Australian Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact