Michaël Bishop

1.2k citations
58 papers · 539 indexed · h-index 7

Michaël Bishop

18 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Michaël Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • General Decision Sciences 77
  • Management Science and Operations Research 114
  • Safety Research 67
  • Education 157
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 31
Replace Robert A. Jako with:
Robert A. Jako United States
Michael H. Baumgardner United States
Matthew Fisher United States
Shenghua Luan Germany
Thomas Schultze Germany
Tzur M. Karelitz United States
Eyal Gamliel Israel
Dennis H. Nagao United States
Bernard Berofsky United States
Louis N. Gray United States
Michaël Bishop relative to Robert A. Jako United States Robert A. Jako's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Robert A. Jako · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Bishop. The network helps show where Michaël Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaël Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Michaël Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20224
2 202026
3 2015129
4 200450
5
School Connectedness - Strengthening Health and Education Outcomes for Teenagers
200478
6 20021
7 20021
8 20011
9 20001
10 19981
11 19981
12 19981
13 19982
14 19971
15 19951
16 19932
17 19881
18 19862
19 19820
20 19792

About Michaël Bishop

Michaël Bishop is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 58 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Poetry (12 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (5 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (2 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (2 papers), School Choice and Performance (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper) and French Literature and Criticism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (77 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (114 citations), Safety Research (67 citations), Education (157 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (31 citations). Michaël Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include John H. Bishop, Michael C. Horowitz, Barbara A. Mellers, Philip E. Tetlock, Lyle Ungar, Eric Stone, S. Emlen Metz, Edgar C. Merkle, Pavel Atanasov and Ferran Mañé. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, The Modern Language Review, Royal Society Open Science, Perspectives on Psychological Science and Neophilologus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026