Thomas Schultze

952 total citations
32 papers, 481 citations indexed

About

Thomas Schultze is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Schultze has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 481 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 9 papers in General Decision Sciences and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Thomas Schultze's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers). Thomas Schultze is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (9 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (7 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers). Thomas Schultze collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Czechia and United Kingdom. Thomas Schultze's co-authors include Stefan Schulz‐Hardt, Andreas Mojzisch, Joachim Hüffmeier, Jens Mazei, Tanja M. Gerlach, Ruben C. Arslan, Lars Penke, Hannes Rakoczy, Jan A. Häusser and David D. Loschelder and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology and Journal of Organizational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Schultze

30 papers receiving 468 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Thomas Schultze Germany 12 152 113 92 89 73 32 481
Susanne Haberstroh Germany 8 128 0.8× 150 1.3× 86 0.9× 46 0.5× 87 1.2× 14 441
Maxim Milyavsky Israel 9 199 1.3× 115 1.0× 96 1.0× 48 0.5× 79 1.1× 14 496
Brian Detweiler–Bedell United States 8 119 0.8× 109 1.0× 155 1.7× 103 1.2× 63 0.9× 16 506
Petko Kusev United Kingdom 13 215 1.4× 160 1.4× 174 1.9× 108 1.2× 102 1.4× 35 755
S. Emlen Metz United States 8 230 1.5× 146 1.3× 95 1.0× 52 0.6× 44 0.6× 11 537
Kevin L. Blankenship United States 15 332 2.2× 198 1.8× 105 1.1× 72 0.8× 92 1.3× 27 746
André Mata Portugal 14 163 1.1× 123 1.1× 208 2.3× 47 0.5× 83 1.1× 58 515
Samuel G. B. Johnson United States 16 158 1.0× 100 0.9× 199 2.2× 53 0.6× 44 0.6× 66 611
Dalia L. Diab United States 8 105 0.7× 127 1.1× 109 1.2× 45 0.5× 108 1.5× 14 412
Gülden Ülkümen United States 8 103 0.7× 87 0.8× 165 1.8× 47 0.5× 105 1.4× 17 447

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Schultze

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Schultze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Schultze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Schultze more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Schultze

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Schultze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Schultze. The network helps show where Thomas Schultze may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Schultze

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Schultze. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Schultze based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Schultze. Thomas Schultze is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2023). First experience with the new extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system Colibrì. Artificial Organs. 48(1). 103–109.
2.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2022). How people use information about the number and distribution of judgments when tapping into the wisdom of the crowds.. Decision. 11(1). 238–254. 1 indexed citations
3.
Schultze, Thomas & Stefan Schulz‐Hardt. (2021). Does change of responsibility reduce escalating commitment? A replication and theoretical extension.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 28(1). 189–204. 1 indexed citations
4.
Schulz‐Hardt, Stefan, et al.. (2021). Do judges prefer advisors with dependent or independent errors? Investigating judges’ advice selection and advice weighting.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 151(7). 1636–1654. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mani, Nivedita, et al.. (2021). Sequential Bayes Factor designs in developmental research: Studies on early word learning. Developmental Science. 24(4). e13097–e13097. 8 indexed citations
6.
Lippold, Matthias, Stefan Schulz‐Hardt, & Thomas Schultze. (2020). G-I transfer in multicue judgment tasks: Discussion improves group members’ knowledge about target relations.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 47(3). 532–545. 2 indexed citations
7.
Unakafov, Anton M., Thomas Schultze, Alexander Gail, et al.. (2020). Emergence and suppression of cooperation by action visibility in transparent games. PLoS Computational Biology. 16(1). e1007588–e1007588. 7 indexed citations
8.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2020). A test of synergy in dynamic system control tasks.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 150(5). 890–914. 2 indexed citations
9.
Schultze, Thomas, Andreas Mojzisch, & Stefan Schulz‐Hardt. (2019). Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do. Judgment and Decision Making. 14(3). 349–363. 7 indexed citations
10.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2019). Towards the Prosody of Persuasion in Competitive Negotiation. The Relationship Between f0 and Negotiation Success in Same Sex Sales Tasks. GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen). 311–315. 1 indexed citations
11.
Gerlach, Tanja M., et al.. (2017). Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 116(2). 313–330. 54 indexed citations
12.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Disentangling the effects of advisor consensus and advice proximity.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 43(10). 1669–1675. 9 indexed citations
13.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2017). Some People Heed Advice Less than Others: Agency (but Not Communion) Predicts Advice Taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 31(3). 430–445. 11 indexed citations
14.
Hüffmeier, Joachim, Jens Mazei, & Thomas Schultze. (2016). Reconceptualizing replication as a sequence of different studies: A replication typology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 66. 81–92. 102 indexed citations
15.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2015). Effects of distance between initial estimates and advice on advice utilization. Judgment and Decision Making. 10(2). 144–171. 42 indexed citations
16.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2015). The effectiveness of imperfect weighting in advice taking. Judgment and Decision Making. 10(3). 265–276. 12 indexed citations
17.
Rakoczy, Hannes, et al.. (2015). Young children heed advice selectively. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 138. 71–87. 16 indexed citations
18.
Häusser, Jan A., et al.. (2014). Experimental evidence for the effects of task repetitiveness on mental strain and objective work performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 35(5). 705–721. 25 indexed citations
19.
Schilbach, Leonhard, Simon B. Eickhoff, Thomas Schultze, Andreas Mojzisch, & Kai Vogeley. (2013). To you I am listening:Perceived competence of advisors influences judgment and decision-making via recruitment of the amygdala. Social Neuroscience. 8(3). 189–202. 15 indexed citations
20.
Schultze, Thomas, et al.. (2011). Biased information processing in the escalation paradigm: Information search and information evaluation as potential mediators of escalating commitment.. Journal of Applied Psychology. 97(1). 16–32. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susanne Haberstroh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maxim Milyavsky Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian Detweiler–Bedell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Petko Kusev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Emlen Metz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kevin L. Blankenship Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by André Mata Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Samuel G. B. Johnson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dalia L. Diab Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gülden Ülkümen
Rankless by CCL
2026