Eric Stone

1.2k total citations
9 papers, 683 citations indexed

About

Eric Stone is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric Stone has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 683 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 3 papers in General Decision Sciences and 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Eric Stone's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers). Eric Stone is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (2 papers). Eric Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States. Eric Stone's co-authors include Lyle Ungar, Barbara A. Mellers, Philip E. Tetlock, Pavel Atanasov, Jonathan Baron, Samuel A. Swift, Terry Murray, Michael C. Horowitz, Michaël Bishop and Don A. Moore and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Management Science and Psychological Science.

In The Last Decade

Eric Stone

9 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eric Stone United States 7 268 194 143 129 127 9 683
Pavel Atanasov United States 13 212 0.8× 161 0.8× 158 1.1× 119 0.9× 156 1.2× 37 723
Samuel A. Swift United States 6 139 0.5× 125 0.6× 92 0.6× 69 0.5× 72 0.6× 8 400
Terry Murray United States 4 127 0.5× 103 0.5× 67 0.5× 58 0.4× 67 0.5× 7 341
Albert E. Mannes United States 6 136 0.5× 152 0.8× 68 0.5× 52 0.4× 156 1.2× 8 489
Clare Harries United Kingdom 18 166 0.6× 196 1.0× 81 0.6× 93 0.7× 194 1.5× 25 835
Michaël Bishop Canada 7 114 0.4× 77 0.4× 63 0.4× 54 0.4× 104 0.8× 58 539
Tomás Lejarraga Germany 15 133 0.5× 379 2.0× 118 0.8× 101 0.8× 137 1.1× 27 706
Emma Heikensten Sweden 5 54 0.2× 113 0.6× 166 1.2× 83 0.6× 113 0.9× 7 750
Paul Weirich United States 13 84 0.3× 137 0.7× 106 0.7× 71 0.6× 105 0.8× 59 560
Philipp Strack United States 18 426 1.6× 231 1.2× 385 2.7× 47 0.4× 64 0.5× 79 911

Countries citing papers authored by Eric Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Stone. The network helps show where Eric Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Stone. Eric Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lancaster, Katie, Eric Stone, & Helen M. Genova. (2019). Cognitive but Not Affective Theory of Mind Deficits in Progressive MS. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 25(8). 896–900. 5 indexed citations
2.
Atanasov, Pavel, Eric Stone, Samuel A. Swift, et al.. (2016). Distilling the Wisdom of Crowds: Prediction Markets vs. Prediction Polls. Management Science. 63(3). 691–706. 96 indexed citations
3.
Mellers, Barbara A., Eric Stone, Pavel Atanasov, et al.. (2015). The psychology of intelligence analysis: Drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 21(1). 1–14. 129 indexed citations
4.
Mellers, Barbara A., Eric Stone, Terry Murray, et al.. (2015). Identifying and Cultivating Superforecasters as a Method of Improving Probabilistic Predictions. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 10(3). 267–281. 126 indexed citations
5.
Atanasov, Pavel, Eric Stone, Samuel A. Swift, et al.. (2015). Distilling the Wisdom of Crowds: Prediction Markets versus Prediction Polls. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 15192–15192. 6 indexed citations
6.
Mellers, Barbara A., Lyle Ungar, Jonathan Baron, et al.. (2014). Psychological Strategies for Winning a Geopolitical Forecasting Tournament. Psychological Science. 25(5). 1106–1115. 186 indexed citations
7.
Baron, Jonathan, Barbara A. Mellers, Philip E. Tetlock, Eric Stone, & Lyle Ungar. (2014). Two Reasons to Make Aggregated Probability Forecasts More Extreme. Decision Analysis. 11(2). 133–145. 84 indexed citations
8.
Merchant, Raina M., David A. Asch, John C. Hershey, et al.. (2013). A Crowdsourcing Innovation Challenge to Locate and Map Automated External Defibrillators. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 6(2). 229–236. 47 indexed citations
9.
Merchant, Raina M., David A. Asch, John C. Hershey, et al.. (2012). Abstract 57: A Crowdsourcing, Mobile Media, Challenge to Locate Automated External Defibrillators. Circulation. 126(suppl_21). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026