Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cooperation and Competition in the Evolution of ATP-Producing Pathways
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Pfeiffer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Pfeiffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Pfeiffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Pfeiffer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Pfeiffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Pfeiffer. The network helps show where Thomas Pfeiffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Pfeiffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Pfeiffer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Pfeiffer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Pfeiffer. Thomas Pfeiffer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pfeiffer, Thomas. (2017). Entwicklungen und aktuelle Fragestellungen des AGB-Rechts. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift: NJW. 70(13). 913–918.
10.
Gutmann, Thomas, Tatjana Hörnle, Frank Neubacher, et al.. (2016). Titelei/Inhaltsverzeichnis. 7(4). I–II.1 indexed citations
11.
Pfeiffer, Thomas, et al.. (2014). DESIGNING TRUST IN WEBSITES - AN EVALUATION OF LEADING INFRASTRUCTURE AS A SERVICE PROVIDERS’ WEBSITES. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 357.1 indexed citations
12.
Pfeiffer, Thomas, et al.. (2014). “A Bank Would Never Write That!” - A Qualitative Study on E-Mail Trust Decisions. TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt). 2093–2104.1 indexed citations
13.
Pfeiffer, Thomas. (2012). Verbraucherrecht mit vielen Säulen – Auf der Suche nach funktionsgerechten Konstruktionsprinzipien eines Rechtsgebiets. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift: NJW. 65(36). 2609–2613.
14.
Pfeiffer, Thomas. (2009). Richtlinienkonforme Auslegung gegen den Wortlaut des nationalen Gesetzes - Die Quelle-Folgeentscheidung des BGH. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift: NJW. 62(7). 412–413.1 indexed citations
15.
Pfeiffer, Thomas. (2008). Von den Principles of European Contract Law zum Draft Common Frame of Reference. 679–707.2 indexed citations
16.
Pfeiffer, Thomas. (2004). Auf dem Weg zu einem Europäischen Vertragsrecht. 15(3). 98–105.2 indexed citations
17.
Pfeiffer, Thomas. (2000). Erfolgsbedingungen grenzüberschreitender regionaler Zusammenarbeit : eine ökonomische Analyse am Beispiel des südlichen Oberrheins und der EUREGIO Gronau. P. Lang eBooks.1 indexed citations
18.
Schuster, Stefan, Thomas Pfeiffer, F. Moldenhauer, Ina Koch, & Thomas Dandekar. (2000). Structural analysis of metabolic networks: elementary flux modes, analogy to petri nets, and application to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. 115–120.10 indexed citations
Fukuyama, Francis, et al.. (1995). Konfuzius und Marktwirtschaft : der Konflikt der Kulturen.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.