Mhairi Bowe
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Juliet R. H. WakefieldBlerina KëlleziFabio SaniMarina HerreraNiamh McNamaraClifford StevensonElizabeth MairMoon Halder
- Topics
- Community Health and Development (9 papers)Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers)Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers)
- Cited by
- ConservationHealthSocial Psychology
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mhairi Bowe
38 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Sociology and Political Science 550
- Social Psychology 515
- Clinical Psychology 318
- General Health Professions 298
- Health 220
Countries citing papers authored by Mhairi Bowe
This map shows the geographic impact of Mhairi Bowe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mhairi Bowe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mhairi Bowe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mhairi Bowe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mhairi Bowe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mhairi Bowe. The network helps show where Mhairi Bowe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mhairi Bowe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mhairi Bowe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mhairi Bowe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mhairi Bowe. Mhairi Bowe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 106 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | Perceived collective continuity and social well-being | 4 |
| 18 | Perceived collective continuity: seeing groups as temporally enduring entities. Self-continuity: individual and collective perspectives | 12 |
| 19 | 90 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Mhairi Bowe
Mhairi Bowe is a scholar working on Conservation, Occupational Therapy and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (9 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (126 citations), Health (220 citations) and Social Psychology (515 citations). Mhairi Bowe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juliet R. H. Wakefield, Blerina Këllezi, Fabio Sani, Marina Herrera, Niamh McNamara, Clifford Stevenson, Elizabeth Mair, Moon Halder, Iain Wilson and Yuefang Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, BMJ Open and European Journal of Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.