Emily C. Webber

636 citations
36 papers · 381 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Emily C. Webber

32 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers

Emily C. Webber
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Health Information Management 62
  • Internal Medicine 39
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 12
  • Health 43
  • General Health Professions 123
Replace Susan E. Conway with:
Susan E. Conway United States
Rahul Sharma United States
Sundas Khan United States
Claire Liétard France
Venkataraman Palabindala United States
Emily M. Hayden United States
Gregory Kabadi Tanzania
Kathryn Pyle Krages United States
Saperi Sulong Malaysia
Nancy Gagliano United States
Emily C. Webber relative to Susan E. Conway United States Susan E. Conway's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Susan E. Conway · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily C. Webber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily C. Webber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily C. Webber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily C. Webber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily C. Webber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily C. Webber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily C. Webber. The network helps show where Emily C. Webber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily C. Webber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily C. Webber Line = papers co-authored together Emily C. Webber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200463
2 202262
3 202032
4 201521
5 202320
6 202119
7 201719
8 202016
9 202016
10 202013
11 201312
12 201910
13 20129
14 20227
15 20177
16 20146
17 20126
18 20175
19 20135
20 20205

About Emily C. Webber

Emily C. Webber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health Information Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Emergency Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 36 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (9 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (7 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (5 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (5 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers) and Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (62 citations), Internal Medicine (39 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (12 citations), Health (43 citations) and General Health Professions (123 citations). Emily C. Webber has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dennis P. Lund, Natalie M. Pageler, S. Trent Rosenbloom, Jessica S. Ancker, Julia Hippisley–Cox, Gill M Price, Lindsay Groom, Joe West, Carol Coupland and Denise Kendrick. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Applied Clinical Informatics, Pediatric Emergency Care, The Journal of Pediatrics and Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact