Peter M. McEvoy
- Applied Psychology top 0.05%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 21
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 101
- Mental Health Research Topics 57
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 65
- Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies 24
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 21
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 20
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 12
- Co-authors
- Alison MahoneyNickolai TitovGavin AndrewsMichelle G. CraskePaula R. NathanPim CuijpersDavid M. Erceg‐HurnMichelle L. Moulds
- Journals
- PLoS ONE (3 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter M. McEvoy
174 papers receiving 8.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Applied Psychology 2.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.2k
- Clinical Psychology 4.8k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 912
Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. McEvoy
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. McEvoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. McEvoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. McEvoy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. McEvoy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. McEvoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. McEvoy. The network helps show where Peter M. McEvoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. McEvoy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 70 |
About Peter M. McEvoy
Peter M. McEvoy is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (101 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (65 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (57 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (24 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (21 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (21 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (20 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (2.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (5.2k citations) and Clinical Psychology (4.8k citations). Peter M. McEvoy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Mahoney, Nickolai Titov, Gavin Andrews, Michelle G. Craske, Paula R. Nathan, Pim Cuijpers, David M. Erceg‐Hurn, Michelle L. Moulds, Blake F. Dear and Sarah Shihata. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.