Peter M. McEvoy
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.1%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Applied Psychology top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Alison MahoneyNickolai TitovGavin AndrewsMichelle G. CraskePaula R. NathanPim CuijpersDavid M. Erceg‐HurnMichelle L. Moulds
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (101 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (65 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (57 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter M. McEvoy
174 papers receiving 8.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 5.2k
- Clinical Psychology 4.8k
- Applied Psychology 2.9k
- Social Psychology 1.6k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. McEvoy
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. McEvoy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. McEvoy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. McEvoy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. McEvoy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. McEvoy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. McEvoy. The network helps show where Peter M. McEvoy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter M. McEvoy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter M. McEvoy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter M. McEvoy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter M. McEvoy. Peter M. McEvoy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 70 |
About Peter M. McEvoy
Peter M. McEvoy is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 183 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (101 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (65 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (57 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (2.9k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (5.2k citations) and Clinical Psychology (4.8k citations). Peter M. McEvoy has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Mahoney, Nickolai Titov, Gavin Andrews, Michelle G. Craske, Paula R. Nathan, Pim Cuijpers, David M. Erceg‐Hurn, Michelle L. Moulds, Blake F. Dear and Sarah Shihata. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.