Megan Montee

866 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 522 citations indexed

About

Megan Montee is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Megan Montee has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 522 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Language and Linguistics, 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Megan Montee's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers). Megan Montee is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (5 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers). Megan Montee collaborates with scholars based in United States. Megan Montee's co-authors include Margaret E. Malone, Weiwei Yang and Sara Cushing Weigle and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, System and Language and Linguistics Compass.

In The Last Decade

Megan Montee

7 papers receiving 485 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing

2011 467 citations Megan Montee System profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Megan Montee United States	5	290	225	182	126	73	7	522
Josef Maňák	7	253 0.9×	173 0.8×	247 1.4×	144 1.1×	74 1.0×	33	564
Nasser Rashidi Iran	14	222 0.8×	183 0.8×	269 1.5×	158 1.3×	42 0.6×	72	553
Mercè Bernaus Spain	7	279 1.0×	191 0.8×	218 1.2×	110 0.9×	99 1.4×	16	500
Wen Qiufang China	8	312 1.1×	262 1.2×	225 1.2×	168 1.3×	83 1.1×	26	550
Christine Coombe United Arab Emirates	13	259 0.9×	231 1.0×	368 2.0×	121 1.0×	63 0.9×	45	631
Manuel Jiménez Raya Spain	9	296 1.0×	246 1.1×	298 1.6×	150 1.2×	76 1.0×	28	581
Jesús Izquierdo Mexico	11	282 1.0×	162 0.7×	107 0.6×	187 1.5×	54 0.7×	36	427
Nahla Nola Bacha Lebanon	12	263 0.9×	229 1.0×	303 1.7×	194 1.5×	56 0.8×	24	623
Petr Najvar Czechia	9	288 1.0×	195 0.9×	368 2.0×	156 1.2×	81 1.1×	63	707
Terry Lamb United Kingdom	11	330 1.1×	285 1.3×	262 1.4×	141 1.1×	128 1.8×	24	576

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Montee

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Montee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Montee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Montee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Montee

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Montee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Montee. The network helps show where Megan Montee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Montee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Montee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Montee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Montee. Megan Montee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Montee, Megan, et al.. (2015). LCTL Teachers’ Assessment Knowledge and Practices: An Exploratory Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7 indexed citations

2.

Malone, Margaret E. & Megan Montee. (2014). Stakeholders' Beliefs about the "TOEFL iBT"® Test as a Measure of Academic Language Ability. "TOEFL iBT"® Research Report. TOEFL iBT-22. ETS Research Report. RR-14-42.. ETS Research Report Series. 4 indexed citations

3.

Malone, Margaret E. & Megan Montee. (2014). Stakeholders' Beliefs About the TOEFL iBT^® Test as a Measure of Academic Language Ability. ETS Research Report Series. 2014(2). 1–51. 13 indexed citations

4.

Weigle, Sara Cushing, Weiwei Yang, & Megan Montee. (2013). Exploring Reading Processes in an Academic Reading Test Using Short-Answer Questions. Language Assessment Quarterly. 10(1). 28–48. 19 indexed citations

5.

Montee, Megan. (2011). Questionnaires in Second Language Research: Construction, Administration, and Processing. System. 39(4). 554–555. 467 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Malone, Margaret E., et al.. (2010). Assessment Practices in STARTALK Language Programs: A View of Current Language Assessment Literacy. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 60(1). 1 indexed citations

7.

Malone, Margaret E. & Megan Montee. (2010). Oral Proficiency Assessment: Current Approaches and Applications for Post‐Secondary Foreign Language Programs. Language and Linguistics Compass. 4(10). 972–986. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact