Mega Subramaniam

1.2k total citations
56 papers, 747 citations indexed

About

Mega Subramaniam is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Mega Subramaniam has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 747 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 17 papers in Education and 16 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Mega Subramaniam's work include Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (11 papers). Mega Subramaniam is often cited by papers focused on Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (11 papers). Mega Subramaniam collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Singapore. Mega Subramaniam's co-authors include Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, John Carlo Bertot, Beth St. Jean, June Ahn, Allison Druin, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Jessica Vitak, Priya Kumar and Kulthida Tuamsuk and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Children and Youth Services Review and Journal of Documentation.

In The Last Decade

Mega Subramaniam

48 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mega Subramaniam United States 18 220 218 189 185 134 56 747
Sylvia L. Edwards Australia 15 316 1.4× 205 0.9× 223 1.2× 137 0.7× 65 0.5× 56 749
Louise Limberg Sweden 13 194 0.9× 322 1.5× 270 1.4× 109 0.6× 172 1.3× 49 708
Natalie Greene Taylor United States 15 96 0.4× 132 0.6× 107 0.6× 123 0.7× 115 0.9× 42 517
Hungwei Tseng United States 13 473 2.1× 55 0.3× 182 1.0× 108 0.6× 107 0.8× 30 841
Rebekah Willett United States 14 206 0.9× 21 0.1× 72 0.4× 242 1.3× 82 0.6× 44 589
Amber Walraven Netherlands 11 669 3.0× 50 0.2× 217 1.1× 189 1.0× 94 0.7× 16 1.0k
Sousan Arafeh United States 8 416 1.9× 21 0.1× 115 0.6× 197 1.1× 100 0.7× 16 692
Lesley Gourlay United Kingdom 20 594 2.7× 16 0.1× 239 1.3× 154 0.8× 53 0.4× 50 983
Swapna Kumar United States 22 1.1k 4.8× 74 0.3× 351 1.9× 114 0.6× 75 0.6× 85 1.6k
Kate Garland United Kingdom 11 212 1.0× 22 0.1× 145 0.8× 126 0.7× 26 0.2× 16 636

Countries citing papers authored by Mega Subramaniam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mega Subramaniam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mega Subramaniam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mega Subramaniam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mega Subramaniam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mega Subramaniam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mega Subramaniam. The network helps show where Mega Subramaniam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mega Subramaniam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mega Subramaniam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mega Subramaniam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mega Subramaniam. Mega Subramaniam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harding, Alison, et al.. (2025). Toward Inclusive E-Government Services: Building Better Digital Literacy Infrastructure and Institutional Support for Marginalized Communities. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
2.
Palmer, Carole L., et al.. (2024). Provocations on iSchools and Librarianship: New Priorities for LIS Forward. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 61(1). 807–811.
3.
Palmer, Carole L., et al.. (2023). Advancing LIS in iSchools : Building a Coalition To Ensure a Vibrant Future. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 60(1). 825–828. 1 indexed citations
4.
Weintrop, David, et al.. (2023). Using design-based implementation research approach to create computational thinking assessment tools for youth programs in public libraries. Library & Information Science Research. 45(2). 101240–101240. 1 indexed citations
5.
Subramaniam, Mega, et al.. (2022). Capturing computational thinking in public libraries: An examination of assessment strategies, audience, and mindset. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 55(2). 358–370. 3 indexed citations
6.
Subramaniam, Mega, et al.. (2020). Examining vulnerability in youth digital information practices scholarship: What are we missing or exhausting?. Children and Youth Services Review. 116. 105241–105241. 6 indexed citations
7.
Jean, Beth St., et al.. (2017). Assessing the health information source perceptions of tweens using card-sorting exercises. Journal of Information Science. 44(2). 148–164. 6 indexed citations
8.
Hoffman, Kelly M., et al.. (2016). Connected Libraries: Surveying the Current Landscape and Charting a Path to the Future. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10 indexed citations
9.
Subramaniam, Mega, et al.. (2015). Bit by Bit: Using Design-Based Research to Improve the Health Literacy of Adolescents. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). e62–e62. 42 indexed citations
10.
Subramaniam, Mega. (2015). New Territory for School Library Research: Let the Data Speak.. Knowledge quest. 43(3). 16–19.
11.
Jean, Beth St., et al.. (2015). Impacts of the HackHealth after‐school program: Motivating youth through personal relevance. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 52(1). 1–11. 1 indexed citations
12.
Thompson, Kim M., Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, Mega Subramaniam, & John Carlo Bertot. (2014). The policy gap. Library journal. 139(14). 36–37. 4 indexed citations
13.
Ahn, June, et al.. (2014). I Want to be a Game Designer or Scientist: Connected Learning and Developing Identities with Urban, African-American Youth. International Conference of Learning Sciences. 2. 657–664. 11 indexed citations
14.
Thompson, Kim M., Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, Mega Subramaniam, & John Carlo Bertot. (2014). Digital Literacy and Digital Inclusion. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks. 11 indexed citations
15.
Greyson, Devon, Denise E. Agosto, Eric M. Meyers, Mega Subramaniam, & June Abbas. (2014). Understanding networked youth and online privacy: Questions, methods and implications. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 51(1). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
16.
Subramaniam, Mega, June Ahn, Natalie Greene Taylor, et al.. (2013). Crosswalk between the Framework for K–12 Science Education and Standards for the 21st Century Learner : School Librarians as the Crucial Link. 16. 6 indexed citations
17.
18.
Subramaniam, Mega, et al.. (2012). Sci-Fi, Storytelling, and New-Media Literacy.. Knowledge quest. 41(1). 22–27. 3 indexed citations
19.
Jaeger, Paul T., et al.. (2011). Diversity and LIS Education: Inclusion and the Age of Information. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 52(3). 166–183. 58 indexed citations
20.
Subramaniam, Mega & Paul T. Jaeger. (2010). Modeling Inclusive Practice?: Attracting Diverse Faculty and Future Faculty to the Information Workforce. Library trends. 59(1-2). 109–127. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sylvia L. Edwards Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louise Limberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Natalie Greene Taylor Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hungwei Tseng Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rebekah Willett Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amber Walraven Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sousan Arafeh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lesley Gourlay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Swapna Kumar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kate Garland
Rankless by CCL
2026