Mega Subramaniam

48 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers

Mega Subramaniam
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Library and Information Sciences 218
  • Communication 134
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 38
  • Computer Science Applications 80
  • Human-Computer Interaction 69
Replace Sylvia L. Edwards with:
Sylvia L. Edwards Australia
Rebekah Willett United States
Natalie Greene Taylor United States
Louise Limberg Sweden
Swapna Kumar United States
Lesley Gourlay United Kingdom
Tian Luo United States
Els Kuiper Netherlands
J. Terwel Netherlands
Sousan Arafeh United States
Mega Subramaniam relative to Sylvia L. Edwards Australia Sylvia L. Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Sylvia L. Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mega Subramaniam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mega Subramaniam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mega Subramaniam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mega Subramaniam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mega Subramaniam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mega Subramaniam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mega Subramaniam. The network helps show where Mega Subramaniam may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mega Subramaniam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mega Subramaniam Line = papers co-authored together Mega Subramaniam links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201461
2
Diversity and LIS Education: Inclusion and the Age of Information
201158
3 201252
4 201542
5 201341
6 201736
7 201534
8 201030
9 201328
10 201827
11
Digital Literacy and Digital Inclusion: Information Policy and the Public Library
201424
12 201123
13 202023
14 201722
15 201821
16 201519
17 201719
18 201317
19 201213
20 201411

About Mega Subramaniam

Mega Subramaniam is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems, having authored 56 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (11 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (10 papers), Web and Library Services (6 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (6 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (5 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (218 citations), Communication (134 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (38 citations), Computer Science Applications (80 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (69 citations). Mega Subramaniam has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, John Carlo Bertot, Beth St. Jean, June Ahn, Allison Druin, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Priya Kumar, Jessica Vitak and Kulthida Tuamsuk. Their work appears in journals such as The Library Quarterly, Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Library & Information Science Research and Public Library Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact