Natalie Greene Taylor

786 total citations
42 papers, 517 citations indexed

About

Natalie Greene Taylor is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Communication and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Greene Taylor has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 517 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Library and Information Sciences, 14 papers in Communication and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Natalie Greene Taylor's work include Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (8 papers). Natalie Greene Taylor is often cited by papers focused on Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (8 papers). Natalie Greene Taylor collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Natalie Greene Taylor's co-authors include Paul T. Jaeger, Mega Subramaniam, Beth St. Jean, Ursula Gorham, John Carlo Bertot, Claire L. Isaac, Elizabeth Milne, Steven Walczak, Kim M. Thompson and Lindsay C. Sarin and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Greene Taylor

37 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Greene Taylor United States 15 132 123 115 107 96 42 517
Tom Rosman Germany 17 39 0.3× 132 1.1× 20 0.2× 47 0.4× 260 2.7× 47 589
Jorge Martínez Lucena Spain 5 11 0.1× 150 1.2× 57 0.5× 59 0.6× 78 0.8× 21 414
Sousan Arafeh United States 8 21 0.2× 197 1.6× 100 0.9× 115 1.1× 416 4.3× 16 692
İrshad Hussaın Pakistan 13 6 0.0× 186 1.5× 32 0.3× 79 0.7× 263 2.7× 42 545
Pablo Delgado Spain 12 32 0.2× 99 0.8× 28 0.2× 217 2.0× 260 2.7× 25 678
Constance A. Mellon United States 11 421 3.2× 88 0.7× 88 0.8× 305 2.9× 212 2.2× 21 728
Jen Ross United Kingdom 16 6 0.0× 141 1.1× 60 0.5× 190 1.8× 366 3.8× 44 749
Erika J. Koch Canada 8 61 0.5× 75 0.6× 6 0.1× 160 1.5× 57 0.6× 15 393
Carita Kiili Finland 20 26 0.2× 180 1.5× 65 0.6× 165 1.5× 577 6.0× 45 919
Najmuddin Shaik United States 8 10 0.1× 61 0.5× 46 0.4× 85 0.8× 494 5.1× 12 715

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Greene Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Greene Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Greene Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Greene Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Greene Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Greene Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Greene Taylor. The network helps show where Natalie Greene Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Greene Taylor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Greene Taylor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Greene Taylor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Greene Taylor. Natalie Greene Taylor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jaeger, Paul T., et al.. (2023). The War on Libraries and the Stories We Must Tell of Innovation and Indomitability. The Library Quarterly. 93(4). 359–361. 1 indexed citations
2.
Jaeger, Paul T., et al.. (2022). Exuberantly Exhuming McCarthy: Confronting the Widespread Attacks on Intellectual Freedom in the United States. The Library Quarterly. 92(4). 321–328. 8 indexed citations
4.
Jaeger, Paul T. & Natalie Greene Taylor. (2021). Arsenals of Lifelong Information Literacy: Educating Users to Navigate Political and Current Events Information in World of Ever-Evolving Misinformation. The Library Quarterly. 91(1). 19–31. 23 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, Natalie Greene. (2018). Youth information-seeking behavior and online government information. Journal of Documentation. 74(3). 509–525. 6 indexed citations
6.
Walczak, Steven & Natalie Greene Taylor. (2017). Geography learning in primary school: Comparing face-to-face versus tablet-based instruction methods. Computers & Education. 117. 188–198. 18 indexed citations
7.
Jean, Beth St., et al.. (2017). Assessing the health information source perceptions of tweens using card-sorting exercises. Journal of Information Science. 44(2). 148–164. 6 indexed citations
8.
Taylor, Natalie Greene, et al.. (2017). Wearable devices: Information privacy, policy and user behavior. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 54(1). 603–605. 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
Subramaniam, Mega, et al.. (2015). Bit by Bit: Using Design-Based Research to Improve the Health Literacy of Adolescents. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). e62–e62. 42 indexed citations
11.
Jean, Beth St., et al.. (2015). The influence of positive hypothesis testing on youths’ online health-related information seeking. New Library World. 116(3/4). 136–154. 19 indexed citations
12.
Jaeger, Paul T., Natalie Greene Taylor, & Ursula Gorham. (2015). Libraries, Human Rights, and Social Justice. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks. 2 indexed citations
13.
Jean, Beth St., et al.. (2015). Impacts of the HackHealth after‐school program: Motivating youth through personal relevance. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 52(1). 1–11. 1 indexed citations
14.
Jaeger, Paul T., Ursula Gorham, Natalie Greene Taylor, & John Carlo Bertot. (2015). Teaching Information Policy in the Digital Age:Issues, Strategies, and Innovation. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science. 56(3). 175–189. 2 indexed citations
15.
Thompson, Kim M., Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, Mega Subramaniam, & John Carlo Bertot. (2014). The policy gap. Library journal. 139(14). 36–37. 4 indexed citations
16.
Thompson, Kim M., Paul T. Jaeger, Natalie Greene Taylor, Mega Subramaniam, & John Carlo Bertot. (2014). Digital Literacy and Digital Inclusion. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks. 11 indexed citations
17.
Subramaniam, Mega, June Ahn, Natalie Greene Taylor, et al.. (2013). Crosswalk between the Framework for K–12 Science Education and Standards for the 21st Century Learner : School Librarians as the Crucial Link. 16. 6 indexed citations
18.
Subramaniam, Mega, June Ahn, Natalie Greene Taylor, et al.. (2013). The role of school librarians in enhancing science learning. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 47(1). 3–16. 17 indexed citations
19.
Bertot, John Carlo, Ursula Gorham, Paul T. Jaeger, & Natalie Greene Taylor. (2012). Public Libraries and the Internet 2012: Key Findings, Recent Trends, and Future Challenges. Public Library Quarterly. 31(4). 303–325. 11 indexed citations
20.
Taylor, Natalie Greene, Claire L. Isaac, & Elizabeth Milne. (2010). A Comparison of the Development of Audiovisual Integration in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Typically Developing Children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 40(11). 1403–1411. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026