Natalie Greene Taylor

786 citations
42 papers · 517 indexed · h-index 15

Natalie Greene Taylor

37 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Natalie Greene Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Library and Information Sciences 132
  • Communication 115
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Information Systems 107
  • Sensory Systems 23
Replace Carita Kiili with:
Carita Kiili Finland
Pablo Delgado Spain
Sousan Arafeh United States
Tom Rosman Germany
Constance A. Mellon United States
Linda D. Labbo United States
Aimée Dorr United States
Jorge Martínez Lucena Spain
Erika J. Koch Canada
Harvey Daniels United States
Natalie Greene Taylor relative to Carita Kiili Finland Carita Kiili's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Carita Kiili · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Greene Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Greene Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Greene Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Greene Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Greene Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Greene Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Greene Taylor. The network helps show where Natalie Greene Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Greene Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Greene Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Greene Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20228
3 20216
4 202123
5 20186
6 201718
7 20176
8 20171
9 201736
10 201542
11 20152
12 20151
13 201519
14 20152
15
The policy gap
20144
16 201411
17 20142
18
Crosswalk between the Framework for K–12 Science Education and Standards for the 21st Century Learner : School Librarians as the Crucial Link
20136
19 201211
20 201073

About Natalie Greene Taylor

Natalie Greene Taylor is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Communication, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Conservation, having authored 42 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers), E-Government and Public Services (8 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (6 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (3 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (132 citations), Communication (115 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations), Information Systems (107 citations) and Sensory Systems (23 citations). Natalie Greene Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paul T. Jaeger, Mega Subramaniam, Beth St. Jean, Ursula Gorham, John Carlo Bertot, Elizabeth Milne, Claire L. Isaac, Steven Walczak, Kim M. Thompson and Lindsay C. Sarin. Their work appears in journals such as The Library Quarterly, Journal of Documentation, Public Library Quarterly, Government Information Quarterly and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026