Matthew Wolf‐Meyer

553 citations
34 papers · 264 indexed · h-index 11

Matthew Wolf‐Meyer

30 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers

Matthew Wolf‐Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Geography, Planning and Development 29
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 20
  • Cultural Studies 26
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 59
Replace James Morley with:
James Morley United States
Marta Weigle United States
Tom Sparrow United States
Felicitas D. Goodman United States
Marina Roseman United States
Robert Α. F. Thurman United States
Anna-Leena Siikala
Robert A. Paul United States
Roger Ivar Lohmann Canada
Robert H. Sharf United States
Matthew Wolf‐Meyer relative to James Morley United States James Morley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
James Morley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Wolf‐Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Wolf‐Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Wolf‐Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Wolf‐Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Wolf‐Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Wolf‐Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Wolf‐Meyer. The network helps show where Matthew Wolf‐Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Wolf‐Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Wolf‐Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Wolf‐Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20231
3 20233
4 20211
5 202010
6 20191
7 20194
8 20193
9 201715
10 201611
11 20152
12 20142
13 201323
14
Parasitic and Symbiotic -- the Ambivalence of Necessity
20123
15 201245
16
The Slumbering Masses: Sleep, Medicine, and Modern American Life
201221
17 20102
18 200912
19 200812
20 20063

About Matthew Wolf‐Meyer

Matthew Wolf‐Meyer is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 34 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, Genetics, and Society (6 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (6 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers) and Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (29 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (20 citations), Cultural Studies (26 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (59 citations). Matthew Wolf‐Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Samuel Gerald Collins, Jonathan Alexánder, Peter Boxall, Gerry Canavan, John Rieder, Priscilla Wald, Ko Ling Chan, Roger Luckhurst, Phillip E. Wegner and Sherryl Vint. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Anthropology, American Ethnologist, BioSocieties, Cultural Anthropology and Medical Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026