James Morley

633 citations
17 papers · 220 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

James Morley

16 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers

James Morley
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Philosophy 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
  • General Psychology 4
  • Geography, Planning and Development 14
  • Clinical Psychology 48
Replace William H. Norman with:
William H. Norman United States
B. Alan Wallace
L. Gregory Jones United States
Iso Kern Switzerland
Stephen Batchelor United States
E Minkowski Switzerland
Scott D. Churchill United States
Waltraut Stein United States
Julia Cassaniti United States
Junko Kitanaka Japan
James Morley relative to William H. Norman United States William H. Norman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
William H. Norman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Morley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Morley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Morley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Morley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Morley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Morley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Morley. The network helps show where James Morley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside James Morley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Morley Line = papers co-authored together James Morley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200147
2 202146
3
Merleau-Ponty, interiority and exteriority, psychic life and the world
199930
4
Imagination and its Pathologies
200325
5 200816
6 201914
7 20028
8 19997
9 19987
10 19957
11 20053
12 20123
13 20213
14 20062
15 19931
16
Merleau-Ponty, Interiority and Exteriority, Psychic Life and the World: Interiority and Exteriority, Psychic Life, and the World
19991
17 20230

About James Morley

James Morley is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (6 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (2 papers) and Social Representations and Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (67 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (14 citations) and Clinical Psychology (48 citations). James Morley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Magnus Englander, Dorothea Olkowski, James Phillips, Christopher M. Aanstoos, Scott D. Churchill and Frederick J. Wertz. Their work appears in journals such as Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, Philosophy, psychiatry & psychology, Theory & Psychology, Philosophy East and West and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact