Felicitas D. Goodman
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- William WoodStephen D. GlazierJames V. SpickardThomas RobbinsIvan KarpMichael WinkelmanAgehananda BharatiC. R. Hallpike
- Topics
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican AnthropologistCurrent Anthropology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Felicitas D. Goodman
27 papers receiving 278 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Sociology and Political Science 128
- Social Psychology 92
- Philosophy 77
- Anthropology 67
- Health 51
Countries citing papers authored by Felicitas D. Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of Felicitas D. Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicitas D. Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicitas D. Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Felicitas D. Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicitas D. Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicitas D. Goodman. The network helps show where Felicitas D. Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felicitas D. Goodman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felicitas D. Goodman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felicitas D. Goodman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felicitas D. Goodman. Felicitas D. Goodman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Las múltiples caras de las posesiones | 1 |
| 3 | 89 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | The exorcism of Anneliese Michel | 19 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Films for the Classroom: The Home-Mode on Super8 | 2 |
| 17 | 58 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Felicitas D. Goodman
Felicitas D. Goodman is a scholar working on General Arts and Humanities, Religious studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 27 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (11 citations), Religious studies (46 citations) and Anthropology (67 citations). Felicitas D. Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Wood, Stephen D. Glazier, James V. Spickard, Thomas Robbins, Ivan Karp, Michael Winkelman, Agehananda Bharati, C. R. Hallpike, Barbara W. Lex and Lola Romanucci‐Ross. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Anthropologist and Current Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.