American Ethnologist

3.4k papers and 80.0k indexed citations

About

The 3.4k papers published in American Ethnologist in the last decades have received a total of 80.0k indexed citations. Papers published in American Ethnologist usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Anthropology (944 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (631 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (671 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (218 papers) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Ethnologist are Akhil Gupta, Lila Abu‐Lughod, Arjun Appadurai, Richard Handler, James Ferguson, Judith T. Irvine, Jeffrey S. Juris, João Biehl, Linda Stone and Jean Comaroff.

In The Last Decade

American Ethnologist

2.4k papers receiving 51.1k citations

Countries where authors publish in American Ethnologist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Ethnologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Ethnologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Ethnologist more than expected).

Fields of papers published in American Ethnologist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Ethnologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Ethnologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026