John Rieder

782 citations
21 papers · 186 indexed · h-index 6

John Rieder

13 papers receiving 113 citations

Peers

John Rieder
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Cultural Studies 70
  • Philosophy 82
  • Literature and Literary Theory 67
  • Geography, Planning and Development 16
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 11
Replace James Berger with:
James Berger United States
Mark Bould United Kingdom
Michel Houellebecq Switzerland
Jerrold E. Hogle United States
Lindon Barrett United States
S. T. Joshi United Kingdom
Éric Savoy Canada
Elana Gomel Israel
Werner Hamacher Germany
H. Bruce Franklin United States
John Rieder relative to James Berger United States James Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
James Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Rieder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Rieder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Rieder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Rieder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Rieder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Rieder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Rieder. The network helps show where John Rieder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Rieder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Rieder Line = papers co-authored together John Rieder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20190
3
Science Fiction and Cultural Theory: A Reader ed. by Sherryl Vint (review)
20181
4
Science Fiction and the Mass Cultural Genre System
201712
5 20151
6 20133
7 20119
8 20101
9 20108
10
Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction
2008120
11 20071
12 20053
13 19985
14 19973
15
Changing representations of minorities East and West : selected essays
19963
16
Multiculturalism and representation : selected essays
19968
17 19912
18 19852
19 19820
20 19814

About John Rieder

John Rieder is a scholar working on Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Cultural Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 21 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (10 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (4 papers), Digital Games and Media (3 papers), Literature, Film, and Journalism Analysis (2 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (2 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (1 paper), Geographies of human-animal interactions (1 paper) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (70 citations), Philosophy (82 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (67 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (16 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (11 citations). John Rieder has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Larry E. Smith, Jonathan Alexánder, Cristina Bacchilega, Peter Boxall, Matthew Wolf‐Meyer, Gerry Canavan, Priscilla Wald, Ko Ling Chan, Roger Luckhurst and Phillip E. Wegner. Their work appears in journals such as Science Fiction Studies, Biography, Extrapolation, Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 and Studies in Romanticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026