Matthew S. Bedke
- Philosophy top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- General Health Professions
- History and Philosophy of Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nathan BallantyneJohn L. PollockJenann IsmaelIan S. EvansDon FallisPeter GroßTerry Horgan
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (14 papers)Free Will and Agency (13 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Matthew S. Bedke
24 papers receiving 202 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Philosophy 206
- Cognitive Neuroscience 148
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
- General Health Professions 25
- History and Philosophy of Science 20
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew S. Bedke
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew S. Bedke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew S. Bedke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew S. Bedke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew S. Bedke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew S. Bedke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew S. Bedke. The network helps show where Matthew S. Bedke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew S. Bedke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew S. Bedke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew S. Bedke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew S. Bedke. Matthew S. Bedke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Non-Descriptive Relativism: Adding Options to the Expressivist Marketplace | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | A Menagerie of Duties? Normative Judgments Are Not Beliefs about Non-Natural Properties | 10 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Ethical Intuitions: What They Are, What They Are Not, and How They Justify | 18 |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Matthew S. Bedke
Matthew S. Bedke is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 233 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (14 papers), Free Will and Agency (13 papers) and Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (206 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (148 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations). Matthew S. Bedke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Ballantyne, John L. Pollock, Jenann Ismael, Ian S. Evans, Don Fallis, Peter Groß and Terry Horgan. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.