Andrew Reisner

800 total citations
15 papers, 211 citations indexed

About

Andrew Reisner is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Reisner has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 211 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Philosophy, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Andrew Reisner's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Andrew Reisner is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (5 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). Andrew Reisner collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United Kingdom. Andrew Reisner's co-authors include Andrew Reisner, Mark Schroeder, Alan Millar, Asbjørn Steglich‐Petersen, Ralph Wedgwood, Nishi Shah, Duncan Pritchard, Clayton Littlejohn, Hannah Ginsborg and Jonas Olson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Studies and Inquiry.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Reisner

13 papers receiving 195 citations

Peers

Andrew Reisner
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Philosophy 201
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 115
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Political Science and International Relations 39
  • Sociology and Political Science 19
Replace Karl Schäfer with:
Karl Schäfer United States
Bart Streumer Netherlands
Kurt Sylvan United Kingdom
Julia Markovits United States
Cameron Boult Canada
Katia Vavova United States
Daniel Star United States
Matthew S. Bedke Canada
E. J. Coffman United States
Benjamin Kiesewetter Germany
Karl Schäfer United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Andrew Reisner
Andrew Reisner · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Andrew Reisner
Andrew Reisner · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Reisner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Reisner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Reisner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Reisner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Reisner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Reisner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Reisner. The network helps show where Andrew Reisner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Reisner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Reisner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Reisner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Reisner. Andrew Reisner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 2
4 13
5 0
6 8
7 11
8
Is the Enkratic Principle a Requirement of Rationality
14
9
Leaps of Knowledge
9
10 8
11 11
12 4
13 76
14 8
15 46

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026