Stephen Kearns

626 total citations
30 papers, 286 citations indexed

About

Stephen Kearns is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Kearns has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 286 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Philosophy, 15 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Stephen Kearns's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers) and Free Will and Agency (11 papers). Stephen Kearns is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers) and Free Will and Agency (11 papers). Stephen Kearns collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Stephen Kearns's co-authors include Daniel Star, Ofra Magidor, Alfred R. Mele and Neil Levy and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Kearns

26 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Kearns United States 10 235 176 113 33 19 30 286
Joachim Horvath Germany 9 176 0.7× 126 0.7× 96 0.8× 42 1.3× 21 1.1× 25 239
Bob Beddor Singapore 10 217 0.9× 101 0.6× 113 1.0× 23 0.7× 33 1.7× 26 246
Sinan Dogramaci United States 8 238 1.0× 97 0.6× 128 1.1× 58 1.8× 53 2.8× 18 260
Carrie Jenkins United Kingdom 8 202 0.9× 60 0.3× 146 1.3× 65 2.0× 37 1.9× 20 259
Marc A. Moffett United States 5 158 0.7× 58 0.3× 114 1.0× 39 1.2× 21 1.1× 11 193
Sarah Sawyer United Kingdom 9 163 0.7× 65 0.4× 147 1.3× 45 1.4× 21 1.1× 24 233
Karl Schäfer United States 11 256 1.1× 119 0.7× 97 0.9× 24 0.7× 28 1.5× 31 294
Anandi Hattiangadi Sweden 10 323 1.4× 118 0.7× 221 2.0× 29 0.9× 15 0.8× 21 376
Kevin Dorst United States 8 159 0.7× 56 0.3× 66 0.6× 28 0.8× 37 1.9× 17 195
Kurt Sylvan United Kingdom 9 240 1.0× 146 0.8× 101 0.9× 18 0.5× 45 2.4× 19 261

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Kearns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Kearns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Kearns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Kearns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Kearns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Kearns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Kearns. The network helps show where Stephen Kearns may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Kearns

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Kearns. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Kearns based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Kearns. Stephen Kearns is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kearns, Stephen. (2022). Tit for tat for tit: On reactive loops and regresses. Analysis. 83(1). 55–60.
2.
Kearns, Stephen, et al.. (2022). Self-Control.
3.
Kearns, Stephen. (2020). Meno, Know-How: Oh No, What Now?. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 99(3). 421–434. 2 indexed citations
4.
Kearns, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Difficult Circumstances: Situationism and Ability. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 1 indexed citations
5.
Kearns, Stephen. (2018). Being, Freedom and Method. Analysis. 79(1). 154–164. 2 indexed citations
6.
Kearns, Stephen. (2018). Reasons, Choices, and Responsibility. Oxford University Press eBooks.
7.
Kearns, Stephen. (2017). Responsibility from the Margins. Analysis. 77(4). 869–872. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kearns, Stephen, et al.. (2017). This is a Tricky Situation: Situationism and Reasons-Responsiveness. The Journal of Ethics. 21(2). 151–183. 5 indexed citations
9.
Kearns, Stephen. (2016). Finding the Value in Things: Remarks on Markovits'sMoral Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 92(2). 539–548. 1 indexed citations
10.
Mele, Alfred R. & Stephen Kearns. (2014). Have compatibilists solved the luck problem for libertarians. 2(2). 9–36. 1 indexed citations
11.
Kearns, Stephen. (2014). Naturalism and the First Person Perspective By LYNNE RUDDER BAKER. Analysis. 74(4). 733–735. 1 indexed citations
12.
Kearns, Stephen. (2013). Free Will Agnosticism. Noûs. 49(2). 235–252. 10 indexed citations
13.
Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2013). Weighing Reasons. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 10(1). 70–86. 16 indexed citations
14.
Kearns, Stephen. (2011). Can a thing be part of itself. American Philosophical Quarterly. 11 indexed citations
15.
Kearns, Stephen. (2011). Aborting the zygote argument. Philosophical Studies. 160(3). 379–389. 28 indexed citations
16.
Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2011). On good advice: a reply to McNaughton and Rawling. Analysis. 71(3). 506–508. 9 indexed citations
17.
Kearns, Stephen. (2010). Ishtiyaque Haji, Incompatibilism's Allure: Principal Arguments for Incompatibilism.. The Philosophical Review. 119(3). 391–394. 2 indexed citations
18.
Kearns, Stephen. (2010). Responsibility for necessities. Philosophical Studies. 155(2). 307–324. 15 indexed citations
19.
Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2008). Reasons: Explanations or Evidence?. Ethics. 119(1). 31–56. 60 indexed citations
20.
Kearns, Stephen. (2007). In praise of folly: a reply to Blome-Tillmann. Analysis. 67(3). 219–222. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026