Jenann Ismael
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Jonathan SchafferTim C. KietzmannMarcel van GervenNikolaus KriegeskorteKatja SeeligerAdrien DoerigTalia KonkleKonrad P. Körding
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers)Quantum Mechanics and Applications (10 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jenann Ismael
35 papers receiving 515 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- History and Philosophy of Science 239
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 199
- Philosophy 185
- Cognitive Neuroscience 184
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 121
Countries citing papers authored by Jenann Ismael
This map shows the geographic impact of Jenann Ismael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenann Ismael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenann Ismael more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jenann Ismael
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenann Ismael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenann Ismael. The network helps show where Jenann Ismael may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenann Ismael
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenann Ismael. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenann Ismael based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenann Ismael. Jenann Ismael is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The neuroconnectionist research programmebreakdown → | 88 |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | Freedom, compulsion, and causation | 13 |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | Doublemindedness: A model for a dual content cognitive architecture | 21 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jenann Ismael
Jenann Ismael is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (10 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (239 citations), Philosophy (185 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations). Jenann Ismael has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Schaffer, Tim C. Kietzmann, Marcel van Gerven, Nikolaus Kriegeskorte, Katja Seeliger, Adrien Doerig, Talia Konkle, Konrad P. Körding, Grace W. Lindsay and Blake A. Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Nature reviews. Neuroscience, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.