E. J. Coffman
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
- Philosophy 22
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 16
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 7
- War, Ethics, and Justification 5
-
- Free Will and Agency 19
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Co-authors
- Nathan Ballantyne (2 shared papers)Ted A. Warfield (2 shared papers)Daniel Howard‐Snyder (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Synthese (4 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (3 papers)Philosophical Explorations (3 papers)Midwest Studies in Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophical Issues (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
E. J. Coffman
21 papers receiving 219 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Philosophy 243
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
- Cognitive Neuroscience 173
- Family Practice 13
- History and Philosophy of Science 16
Countries citing papers authored by E. J. Coffman
This map shows the geographic impact of E. J. Coffman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. J. Coffman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. J. Coffman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. J. Coffman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. J. Coffman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. J. Coffman. The network helps show where E. J. Coffman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside E. J. Coffman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 67 | |
| 2 | Uniqueness, Evidence, and Rationality | 2011 | 39 |
| 3 | 2011 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 1 |
About E. J. Coffman
E. J. Coffman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (19 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (243 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (120 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (173 citations), Family Practice (13 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (16 citations). E. J. Coffman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Nathan Ballantyne, Ted A. Warfield and Daniel Howard‐Snyder. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Explorations, Midwest Studies in Philosophy and Philosophical Issues.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.