Daniel Star

445 total citations
16 papers, 215 citations indexed

About

Daniel Star is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Star has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 215 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Philosophy, 6 papers in General Health Professions and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Daniel Star's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (6 papers). Daniel Star is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (6 papers). Daniel Star collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniel Star's co-authors include Stephen Kearns and Candice Delmas and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Ethics and Hypatia.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Star

14 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniel Star United States	7	175	123	62	29	27	16	215
Pekka Väyrynen United Kingdom	10	192 1.1×	125 1.0×	77 1.2×	31 1.1×	30 1.1×	22	259
Bart Streumer Netherlands	11	333 1.9×	258 2.1×	98 1.6×	22 0.8×	27 1.0×	24	382
Andrew Reisner Canada	9	201 1.1×	115 0.9×	70 1.1×	19 0.7×	16 0.6×	15	211
Matthew S. Bedke Canada	10	206 1.2×	148 1.2×	63 1.0×	10 0.3×	25 0.9×	25	233
Sergio Tenenbaum Canada	10	266 1.5×	192 1.6×	69 1.1×	21 0.7×	22 0.8×	30	337
Katia Vavova United States	5	141 0.8×	100 0.8×	26 0.4×	40 1.4×	9 0.3×	8	166
Karl Schäfer United States	11	256 1.5×	119 1.0×	97 1.6×	28 1.0×	14 0.5×	31	294
E. J. Coffman United States	9	243 1.4×	173 1.4×	120 1.9×	46 1.6×	13 0.5×	26	277
Caj Strandberg Sweden	9	131 0.7×	124 1.0×	28 0.5×	18 0.6×	28 1.0×	25	191
Michael Pace United States	8	105 0.6×	77 0.6×	51 0.8×	43 1.5×	9 0.3×	9	157

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Star

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Star's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Star with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Star more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Star

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Star. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Star. The network helps show where Daniel Star may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Star

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Star. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Star based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Star. Daniel Star is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Star, Daniel. (2018). Introduction. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

2.

Star, Daniel. (2016). From Outside of EthicsGibbons, John. The Norm of Belief.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Pp. 320. $85.00 (cloth).. Ethics. 126(4). 1139–1148. 1 indexed citations

3.

Star, Daniel. (2016). Replies to Cuneo, Driver, and Littlejohn. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 93(3). 728–744. 3 indexed citations

4.

Star, Daniel. (2015). Knowing Better: Virtue, Deliberation, and Normative Ethics. 6 indexed citations

5.

Star, Daniel. (2015). Knowing Better. Oxford University Press eBooks. 15 indexed citations

6.

Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2013). Weighing Reasons. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 10(1). 70–86. 16 indexed citations

7.

Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2013). Reasons, Facts‐About‐Evidence, and Indirect Evidence. Analytic Philosophy. 54(2). 237–243. 6 indexed citations

8.

Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2011). On good advice: a reply to McNaughton and Rawling. Analysis. 71(3). 506–508. 9 indexed citations

9.

Star, Daniel. (2011). Two levels of moral thinking1. Oxford University Press eBooks. 1. 75–96. 2 indexed citations

10.

Star, Daniel & Candice Delmas. (2011). Three Conceptions of Practical Authority. Jurisprudence. 2(1). 143–160. 3 indexed citations

11.

Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2009). Reasons as Evidence. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 4. 215–242. 52 indexed citations

12.

Kearns, Stephen & Daniel Star. (2008). Reasons: Explanations or Evidence?. Ethics. 119(1). 31–56. 60 indexed citations

13.

Star, Daniel. (2008). MORAL KNOWLEDGE, EPISTEMIC EXTERNALISM, AND INTUITIONISM. Ratio. 21(3). 329–343. 8 indexed citations

14.

Star, Daniel. (2002). Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A Reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia. 17(1). 77–106. 30 indexed citations

15.

Star, Daniel. (2002). Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A Reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia. 17(1). 77–106. 1 indexed citations

16.

Star, Daniel. (2002). Do Confucians Really Care? A Defense of the Distinctiveness of Care Ethics: A Reply to Chenyang Li. Hypatia. 17(1). 77–106. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact