Julia Markovits

548 total citations
6 papers, 203 citations indexed

About

Julia Markovits is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Julia Markovits has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 203 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Julia Markovits's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers). Julia Markovits is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Free Will and Agency (3 papers) and War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers). Julia Markovits collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Julia Markovits's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

Julia Markovits

6 papers receiving 180 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Julia Markovits United States	3	172	143	34	33	25	6	203
Peter A. Graham United States	6	163 0.9×	168 1.2×	21 0.6×	25 0.8×	25 1.0×	9	216
Caj Strandberg Sweden	9	131 0.8×	124 0.9×	28 0.8×	28 0.8×	11 0.4×	25	191
Philip Stratton‐Lake United Kingdom	7	199 1.2×	148 1.0×	38 1.1×	36 1.1×	40 1.6×	27	251
Sergio Tenenbaum Canada	10	266 1.5×	192 1.3×	69 2.0×	22 0.7×	44 1.8×	30	337
Folke Tersman Sweden	6	119 0.7×	103 0.7×	14 0.4×	28 0.8×	53 2.1×	24	191
Pekka Väyrynen United Kingdom	10	192 1.1×	125 0.9×	77 2.3×	30 0.9×	35 1.4×	22	259
Jussi Suikkanen United Kingdom	8	119 0.7×	90 0.6×	29 0.9×	24 0.7×	34 1.4×	32	164
Paul Russell Canada	7	120 0.7×	129 0.9×	21 0.6×	10 0.3×	26 1.0×	32	177
Neil Sinclair United Kingdom	8	137 0.8×	84 0.6×	33 1.0×	29 0.9×	16 0.6×	29	154
François Schroeter Australia	10	109 0.6×	66 0.5×	65 1.9×	13 0.4×	13 0.5×	26	167

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Markovits

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Markovits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Markovits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Markovits more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Markovits

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Markovits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Markovits. The network helps show where Julia Markovits may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Markovits, Julia. (2020). Normativity from Rationality: A Comment on John Broome. Australasian Philosophical Review. 4(4). 343–352. 1 indexed citations

2.

Markovits, Julia. (2016). Précis of Moral Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 92(2). 518–530. 1 indexed citations

3.

Markovits, Julia. (2016). Reply to Sobel and Kearns. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 92(2). 549–559. 2 indexed citations

4.

Markovits, Julia. (2014). Moral Reason. Oxford University Press eBooks. 54 indexed citations

5.

Markovits, Julia. (2012). Saints, heroes, sages, and villains. Philosophical Studies. 158(2). 289–311. 31 indexed citations

6.

Markovits, Julia. (2010). Acting for the Right Reasons. The Philosophical Review. 119(2). 201–242. 114 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact