Martin Johnson

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
57 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Martin Johnson is a scholar working on Education, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Martin Johnson has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Education, 13 papers in Human Factors and Ergonomics and 13 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Martin Johnson's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (20 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (13 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers). Martin Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (20 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (13 papers) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (6 papers). Martin Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Martin Johnson's co-authors include Victoria Crisp, Neil Mercer, John F. Bell, W. D. Maxon, Stuart Shaw, Beth Black, Jackie Greatorex, Paul Warwick, Carenza Lewis and David Fairris and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Analytical Chemistry and Trends in Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Martin Johnson

49 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual

1986 2.1k citations Martin Johnson Trends in Genetics profile →

Peers

Martin Johnson

MB

GENET

EDUCA

PHEOH

IMMUN

David C. Hughes United Kingdom

Ann C. M. Smith United States

Kathleen Mahon United States

Bruce A. Fenderson United States

Gísli Másson Iceland

Herbert A. Lubs United States

Rebecca S. Hartley United States

David J. Asai United States

Joseph M. Scandura United States

Amy K. Kiefer United States

David C. Hughes United Kingdom

Martin Johnson

877 ×0.6

MB

530 ×0.7

GENET

319 ×1.3

EDUCA

273 ×1.1

PHEOH

138 ×0.7

IMMUN

Citations per year, relative to Martin Johnson Martin Johnson (= 1×) peers David C. Hughes

Countries citing papers authored by Martin Johnson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Johnson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Johnson. The network helps show where Martin Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Johnson. Martin Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2024). What is non-formal learning (and how do we know it when we see it)? A pilot study report. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1).

2.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2022). Development challenges in challenging contexts: A 3-stage curriculum framework design approach for Education in Emergencies. Prospects. 53(1-2). 43–56. 1 indexed citations

3.

Greatorex, Jackie, et al.. (2020). Context matters—Adaptation guidance for developing a local curriculum from an international curriculum framework. Apollo (University of Cambridge). 2 indexed citations

4.

Johnson, Martin & Neil Mercer. (2019). Using sociocultural discourse analysis to analyse professional discourse. Learning Culture and Social Interaction. 21. 267–277. 19 indexed citations

5.

Crisp, Victoria, et al.. (2018). A question of quality: Conceptualisations of quality in the context of educational test questions. Research in Education. 105(1). 18–41. 7 indexed citations

6.

Johnson, Martin & Stuart Shaw. (2018). What is computer-based testing washback, how can it be evaluated and how can this support practitioner research?. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 43(9). 1255–1270. 7 indexed citations

7.

Johnson, Martin. (2016). Feedback effectiveness in professional learning contexts. Review of Education. 4(2). 195–229. 11 indexed citations

8.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2015). Finding the common ground: Teachers' and employers' representations of English in an assessment context. English in Education. 49(2). 150–166. 3 indexed citations

9.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2012). Marking Extended Essays on Screen: Exploring the Link between Marking Processes and Comprehension. E-Learning and Digital Media. 9(1). 50–68. 4 indexed citations

10.

Crisp, Victoria, et al.. (2011). The effects of features of examination questions on the performance of students with dyslexia. British Educational Research Journal. 38(5). 813–839. 5 indexed citations

11.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2010). Intention, Interpretation and Implementation: Some Paradoxes of Assessment for Learning across Educational Contexts. Research in Comparative and International Education. 5(2). 122–130. 9 indexed citations

12.

Johnson, Martin & Victoria Crisp. (2009). An Exploration of the Effect of Pre-Release Examination Materials on Classroom Practice in the UK. Research in Education. 82(1). 47–59. 3 indexed citations

13.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2009). Marking essays on screen: An investigation into the reliability of marking extended subjective texts. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(5). 814–826. 23 indexed citations

14.

Johnson, Martin. (2008). Exploring assessor consistency in a Health and Social Care qualification using a sociocultural perspective. Journal of Vocational Education and Training. 60(2). 173–187. 11 indexed citations

15.

Johnson, Martin. (2008). Assessing at the borderline: Judging a vocationally related portfolio holistically. Issues in educational research. 18(1). 26–43. 9 indexed citations

16.

Johnson, Martin. (2004). Personalised Learning. New Economy. 11(4). 224–228. 20 indexed citations

17.

Johnson, Martin. (2001). Making teaching boom proof: The future of the teaching profession. New Economy. 8(4). 203–207. 1 indexed citations

18.

Johnson, Martin. (1997). Commentary: Cloning humans?. BioEssays. 19(8). 737–739. 4 indexed citations

19.

Johnson, Martin. (1986). Manipulating the mouse embryo: A laboratory manual. Trends in Genetics. 2. 298–298. 2073 indexed citations breakdown →

20.

Johnson, Martin. (1954). Aesthetics and the Gestalt. Physics Bulletin. 5(50). 28–28. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact